|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, December 04, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Previous
| Next
BJP cautious, Cong. sees hope
By Neena Vyas
NEW DELHI, DEC. 3. Though the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party was
somewhat cautious in its response today to Pakistan's offer of
exercising ``maximum restraint'' on the Line of Control in
Kashmir, the Opposition parties, particularly the Left and the
Congress, view the offer as a ``positive development'' which
could be used to start ``parallel talks'' with Pakistan even as
India goes ahead to develop its offer of talks with militant
groups in Kashmir.
In fact, several Kashmiri leaders are here - Mr. Abdul Ghani
Bhat, chairman of the All-Party Hurriyat Conference, and Mirwaiz
Umer Farooq, former chairman, flew in today; Mr. Yaseen Malik,
Jammu and Kashmir Liberation Front chairman, was already here,
and Mr. Abdul Ghani Lone, another senior Hurriyat leader, is
expected back from Pakistan in the next few days. Some
``informal-level'' contacts are expected to take place.
The APHC has already welcomed Pakistan's offer as a ``step in the
right direction'' and hoped India would ``reciprocate'' and
``take more bold steps'' such as its unilateral ceasefire offer
to help start a political dialogue and find a solution to the
Kashmir problem. Separately, Dr. Farooq Abdullah told PTI in New
Delhi that ``we have kept our doors open for anyone who wishes to
restore peace in the Valley'', and that ``insaniyat
(humanitarianism)'' would be the guiding principle.
Though it is being admitted that there is nothing new in
Pakistan's offer of ``restraint'' along the LoC and that Pakistan
had not addressed the basic issue of cross-border terrorism, a
view seems to be developing that however small the window
Pakistan has opened, India should seize the opportunity to look
for restarting the derailed dialogue. Mr. Bangaru Laxman, BJP
president, told The Hindu that in addition to ``restraint on the
LoC'' Pakistan should also ``pave the way for a dialogue with
India by ordering cessation of cross-border terrorism. If that
were to happen, I do not think India would have any objection to
talks with Pakistan under the Shimla Agreement or the Lahore
Declaration,'' he said.
Mr. Jana Krishnamurthi, party vice-president, similarly
emphasised the need to end cross-border terrorism. ``We have
always adopted a defensive posture on the LoC. To that extent the
offer of restraint by Pakistan is meaningless,'' However, he was
hopeful that the next couple of days should see ``some
clarifications from Pakistan, if they are serious''.
The Left and the Congress feel that along with informal contacts
with militant groups in the Valley, the Government should make
attempts to start ``parallel talks'' with Pakistan ``at some
level''. Mr. Natwar Singh, party leader and former External
Affairs Minister, said, ``The Pakistan offer is to be welcomed.
We should look at it with an unprejudiced mind. We made a
gesture, they have responded. This could lead to talks which
could be held under the Shimla Agreement.'' But ``tripartite
talks'' between India, Pakistan and Kashmiri militant groups
``were out of the question''.
Mr. A.B. Bardhan, CPI general secretary, saw in the Pakistan
response a ``process of inching forward towards talks''. The
Centre's reaction should be positive and the opportunity ``should
not be rejected out of hand''. Mr. Prakash Karat, CPI(M)
politburo member, was of the view that at ``some level'' talks
with Pakistan would have to begin. It was time India ``spelt out
its political approach to the problem.''
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Previous : Infiltration the issue: Advani Next : 'Pak. response encouraging' | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|