|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, December 07, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Next
Demand for Ministers' resignations rejected
By Neena Vyas
NEW DELHI, DEC. 6. The Prime Minister, Mr. Atal Behari Vajpayee,
today strongly defended the Ayodhya agitation for the
construction of a Ram temple terming it an ``expression of
nationalist feelings'' and said the ``task has remained
unfinished''.
Mr. Vajpayee was talking to reporters informally after both the
Houses of Parliament had been adjourned for the third consecutive
day with the Opposition vociferously demanding resignations of
Mr. L. K. Advani, Dr. Murli Manohar Joshi and Ms. Uma Bharati,
all Cabinet Ministers chargesheeted in the Babri Masjid
demolition case.
Speaking in Hindi he said: ``Ayodhya mein Ram mandir ka nirman ek
rashtriya bhavna ka prakatikaran ka kaam tha, weh abhi poora
nahin hua.'' (In Ayodhya the Ram temple construction project was
the expression of nationalist feelings, the work has not yet been
completed).
Opposition incensed
The Prime Minister's remarks immediately came under attack from
the Opposition and even his allies, including the Telugu Desam,
felt he should have avoided making such comments.
Mr. Vajpayee's remarks come even as the Vishwa Hindu Parishad is
preparing to announce at the `kumbh mela' next month a firm date
to start construction of the temple. Significantly, the Prime
Minister's statement - almost his first major defence of the
Ayodhya agitation - follows a crucial dinner meeting with top RSS
leaders at his residence last week where partymen feel the issue
would have been discussed at length. The Home Minister, Mr.
Advani, was also present. Also, at yesterday's parliamentary
party meeting, BJP MPs were told to go on the offensive on the
Ayodhya issue.
The Vajpayee cue was picked up immediately by the party general
secretary, Mr. Pyarelal Khandelwal, who said: ``If this is what
the Prime Minister has said, I welcome it.'' And separately,
Swami Chinmayanand and Swami Aditya Nath, both BJP MPs from Uttar
Pradesh, demanded that the completion of the unfinished agenda
through legislation to enable the building of a grand Ram temple
at the disputed site without waiting for the court verdict. The
party spokesperson, Mr. Vijay Kumar Malhotra, did not want to
comment on the Prime Minister's remarks, but described the
Opposition's stalling tactics today as a ``black day for
democracy.''
Separately, in a statement from Jaipur, the party president, Mr.
Bangaru Laxman, warned political parties not to politicise the
Ayodhya issue or use it to brandish their ``secular
credentials''. The BJP did not make any mistake and would not
tender any apology on the issue, he added.
`A different case'
The Prime Minister also strongly defended his Ministers and said
there was no basis for demanding their resignations. ``This case
was different from others. The whole background of the Ayodhya
agitation would have to be looked at.'' His view was that ``they
were present at the site (on December 6, 1992, when the structure
was demolished, but to associate them with pulling down the
disputed structure was against established facts.''
Giving the ministers a certificate of innocence (although the
trial is yet to take place and the matter is in the courts), Mr.
Vajpayee said that ``they were trying to control the crowd. they
were telling them they had gathered at the place to protest, not
to pull down the structure.''
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Next : Vajpayee clarifies | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|