|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, December 08, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Entertainment
| Previous
| Next
Spellbinding drama
The Other Festival where artistes straddling different cultures
and disciplines took the stage was a mixed bag, says V. R.
DEVIKA.
SOMETIMES IT was exhilarating, sometimes it was impossible. I was
reminded of Alice in Wonderland when the caterpillar had
addressed her in a sleepy voice saying, ``Who are you?'' to which
Alice had replied ``I ... I hardly know Sir, just at present ..
at least I know who I was when I got up this morning, but I think
I must have changed several times since then..''
Most artistes who performed at the Other Festival must have
thought like Alice. Even the festival organisers must be feeling
the same... The Other Festival, say Anita Ratnam and Ranvar Shah
is ``to celebrate diversity by encouraging artistes and
performers who bring a different perspective to their work.''
The artistes who were invited straddle different cultures and
disciplines and some are struggling with multiple identities and
some have to make their presence felt in multi-cultural ambience
of the place of their residence.
There was good fun too. The festival in fact began on that note.
The slapstick comedy that brought to focus the sharp play of
words that one might see in the inter-collegiate festivals at
IITs was ``Curfew,'' a play by a group of young theatre artistes
from Mumbai who call themselves ``Working Title''. (Crazy Mohan
for the English-speaking elite of Chennai.) The Working Title had
it all worked out and had good fun too. Perfect timing good lines
and great acting. Versatile with two actors playing several
different character and creating magic on the stage.
There was the pipal tree that sang songs and acted almost as the
Sutradhar. There were the twin brothers trying to help each other
get rid of the fear of the curfew and then the God of Death,
Yama, who arrived with a plastic bucket for a hat and two carrots
for ears and a long gourd for the mace. With all the drama that
unfolded Jaimini Pathak and Rommie Jaspal bringing alive a holy
baba, a multinational head who ruthlessly looks at the bottom
line of the sales graph, a mother obsessed with making her son
someone in life they had the audience totally engrossed.
``Love Cycle'', a solo theatre presentation by Sohrab Ardeshir of
Mumbai and New York had the same effect - total. Sohrab recited
the words with great effect and in a three-part monologue brought
out the tragedy of a man giving advice on charming a woman on a
date, a call to a woman at the end of a relationship and a
drunken man in a party obsessed with women's breasts. His voice,
body language and honesty came through in his work. Marvellous
show indeed.
New expression
Akram Khan, Kathak dancer from the U.K., employed Kathak as a
structural base while breaking into contemporary movements to
create new dance expressions, as the brochure said. He presented
two pieces, ``Loose in Flight'' and ``Fix''. He says ``Fix'' drew
energy from Sufism's Whirling Dervishes and the search for an
innovative, chemical fusion of sound, light and movement. He has
been hailed as a ``New Shooting Star'' in the U.K.
While Akram began well with his ``Loose in Flight'', ``Fix'' had
problems with energy and execution and did not quite know what it
was. There was an inherent power and good dancing base and
technique but there was a missing element in it. Akram Khan is
yet to discover a personal language of movement. A personal
language has to be an organic statement of the person. Akram Khan
has the potential to realise that soon. He failed to convince in
his improvisations in Kathak with the mridangam and the flute.
Mridangam, not used to the rhythmic structure of Kathak, has to
be used with a great deal of thought and a sense of loss need not
be conveyed to the audience in a hastily rehearsed piece.
With Adishakti's ``Ganapathi,'' directed by Veenapani Chawla, the
audience were treated to a medley of percussion with Kudiyattam's
mizhavu as the central piece. Pondicherry-based Veenapani used
rhythm as a narrative and told the story of the birth of
Ganapathi and Marthanda. Her signature, comical spoof on
Kudiyattam with its long drawn speech pattern and the deliberate
use of the Malayali accent, was charming and the drumming was
brilliant. The addition of saxophone was a very good idea.But in
the end, it was the lack of content that allowed monotony set in.
Odissi redefined
Ramli Ibrahim from Malaysia presented his Sutra theatre with
vignettes of Japanese flute playing, a monologue piece of acting
and a dance that deconstructed traditional Odissi. While it was
powerful dancing, the context and the painful expression on Ramli
Ibrahim's face made it seem like a strain. Rathimala bestowed an
earthy power to her dancing. The deconstruction placed the dance
in a different context and different costuming. ``Sarasa'', or
the dance mother, a monologue performed by Sabera Shaik would
have had better effect if she had thrown her voice and made
herself clear and if the piece had had some humour in it. There
was too much melodrama there though the performance was powerful.
The best piece in the presentation was the Japanese Shakuhachi
Honkyoku flute by Christopher Yohmei Blasdel and the dance by
Ramli Ibrahim that imaged it. The dance by three girls called
``points of difference'' perhaps belonged to a ramp walk in a
beauty pageant. Though they are all extremely well-trained
dancers, the meaning of the dance did not get through to the
audience. An irony is that all the presentations need to justify
their work by talking about it. When statements are needed to
support a work of art, it becomes laboured.
The Other Festival retains its ``otherness'' in the classical
``Madras Season'' in a meticulous way. The thought given to
lighting, presentation, the inclusion of plastic arts and
photography and the artistic introductions, all add to the
sophistication of the festival that has now become a landmark
event. There is a quality of strength to the festival that has
been giving a platform to people who need to express differently.
But why not reserve space to a Chennai theatre like
Koothupattarai ? Chennai has been a place that has orthodoxy in
plenty but has also given birth to new movements in dance with
Chandralekha, theatre with Koothupattarai and plastic art with
the Cholamandal artists village. They should be showcased too in
a festival that has national and international perspective.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Entertainment Previous : Fine stroke of creativity Next : A timeless storm sweeps again | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|