|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, December 09, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Previous
| Next
All-party meet fails to break deadlock
By Our Special Correspondent
NEW DELHI, DEC. 8. After a nearly two-hour heated discussion
among party leaders at a meeting called by the Lok Sabha Speaker,
Mr G.M.C.Balayogi, this afternoon, there was no resolution in
sight of the deadlock that has paralysed Parliament for five
days. Party leaders will meet again in his chamber on Monday an
hour before Parliament convenes.
The earlier issue of a discussion demanding resignations of the
three Ministers chargesheeted in the Babri demolition case was
partly overtaken by the fresh controversy over the Prime
Minister's remarks on the Ram temple.
The new twist helped to virtually isolate the Bharatiya Janata
Party, with even its allies and supporting parties strongly
disapproving the Prime Minister's remarks.
The plan, earlier, was for the Prime Minister also to attend the
meeting to find a way out, but this morning the Speaker
reportedly advised him not to attend, sensing that the attack
would be on his statements. Since the Prime Minister did not
attend, Ms. Sonia Gandhi, Congress president, who was to have
come, also stayed away.
At the meeting, the Minister for Parliamentary Affairs, Mr.
Pramod Mahajan, offered the opposition a discussion on any
subject - including the demand for the resignations of the three
Ministers or the Prime Minister's statements on Ayodhya - under
any rule provided that it was under a proper and appropriate rule
of procedure.
The Government's position was that the Opposition should give
proper notice and convince the Speaker whose decision all should
accept. Mr. Mahajan wanted the Opposition to agree before hand to
accept the Speaker's decision.
He wanted to know why the Opposition, which raised the issue of
the resignations because the Prime Minister recently accepted the
resignation of Mr. Harin Pathak, chargesheeted in a case, did so
only on December 4 and not on the opening day of Parliament since
Mr. Pathak's resignation had been accepted before the start of
the winter session.
The Opposition was not being logical as the Ministers had been
functioning in their positions since 1998, he felt.
The Congress, the Left parties, the Bahujan Samaj Party, the
Samajwadi Party, the Rashtriya Janata Dal, and even the NDA
allies seemed to be in favour of a discussion under a substantive
motion like Rule 184, and are expected to press for this.
Although the allies were not with the Opposition on the
resignation issue earlier, it was clear that the Prime Minister's
statement that the temple could be built on the disputed site
agitated them considerably. The allies charged that the Prime
Minister's statement had communalised the atmosphere and amends
must be made to ``correct this'' and they are looking for an
opportunity to make clear their views on the sensitive Ayodhya
subject in Parliament.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Previous : Vajpayee 'communalising atmosphere', say allies Next : Ceasefire is forward-looking 'new' idea, says India | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|