|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, December 11, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
Parassinikkadavu Snake Park closed down
By Our Staff Reporter
KANNUR, DEC. 10. In a surprising, though not wholly unexpected,
move, the Forest and Wildlife Department today enforced the
closure of the Parassinikkadavu Snake Park run by the Mr. M.V.
Raghavan-headed Pappinissery Vishchikitsa Society and seized all
wildlife creatures kept there to be released in various wildlife
habitats on the ground that the animals kept at the park were
illegally procured in violation of the provisions of the Wildlife
Protection Act, 1972.
Forest and Wildlife officials, however, were forced to keep the
animals at the park itself as the Payyannur Judicial First Class
Magistrate, Mr. Ananthakrishnan, in charge of the Taliparamba
court, refused to grant the release order. The Magistrate, who
visited the park late in the afternoon, ordered the officials to
keep the animals under judicial custody till tomorrow.
The Forest officials headed by Mr. Mehar Singh, Conservator
(Wildlife), Northern Circle, and Mr. G.J. Teggi, Conservator
(Forests), Northern Circle, reached the park with a large
contingent of police and Forest personnel at 5 a.m. The officials
enforced the closure order, served by the Chief Conservator of
Forests (Wildlife), and confiscated all the animals.
The closure of the park and the confiscation of the animals
followed the Central Government decision rejecting the request
for recognition to the Snake Park dated June 30, 2000, which
allowed the officials to implement the order of the Central Zoo
Authority (CZA) for closing down the park on April 27, 1998. The
closure order also cited the recent observation of the Supreme
Court against operation of unauthorised zoos.
The Forest officials and staff took nearly 12 hours to finish the
work of shifting the animals from cages at the park to special
cages. Mr. Mehar Singh told The Hindu that the animals would be
kept under observation for two days and tested for parasite load
by expert wildlife veterinary doctors before they were released
to wildlife habitats.
The action against the park and the confiscation of the animals
were part of the investigation into the charge of illegal venom
extraction by the park management, he added.
According to the officials, the number of animals seized from the
park exceeded the number of 205, as per the list given by the
park officials.
The animals at the park included lion-tailed macaque, bonnet
macaque, Nilgiri langur, crocodiles, snakes, including king
cobras, and various species of feathered creatures. The officials
said the snake park had not submitted any application for
mandatory recognition under Section 38 H of the Wildlife
(Protection) Act on or before the prescribed date of August 3,
1993. The application for recognition was given for the first
time by the park authorities on February 10, 1995. Asked about
the source from which the park had acquired animals afresh, the
park authorities informed the CZA that the park was developed
with the support of public after it was destroyed on February 10,
1993.
Following the evaluation by the technical committee of the CZA on
March 10, 1998, the recognition for the park had been refused on
the ground that the park management had not provided evidence of
their acquiring animals legally.
Following a representation to the Union Ministry of Environment
against the CZA order, the Central Government gave the park
authorities six months' time, followed by another extension of
three months (up to January 25, 2000), to produce the procurement
certificate of animals in their stock. The park authorities had
not produced the certificates by the prescribed time, they said.
Instead, the park officials preferred to stall the procedures by
filing an OP in the High Court though the court was yet to give
any favourable order, the officials said.
Talking to presspersons in the afternoon, Mr. M.V. Raghavan, who
is the president of the Visha Chikitsa Society, said he would
take legal procedures to question the Government's action of
confiscating the animals in violation of the directive of the
Additional Director of Prosecutions that no action would be taken
against the park as long as the case was pending in the High
Court.
Snake Park sources said that the park, started in 1982, obtained
ownership certificates for 13 snakes in 1980. In 1982, two
crocodiles were purchased from the Madras Snake Park with all
relevant documents. At present, the park had a total of 205
animals, including 18 snake species, 61 crocodiles, primates,
etc., of which certificate was granted by the Chief Wildlife
Conservator for keeping 164 animals.
As many as 105 creatures in the park perished when it was
vandalised by CPI(M) workers on February 10, 1993. The park now
possessed 52 of the total 59 creatures that survived the mayhem,
they said. Thus, the total number of animals for which the park
had no ownership certificate was 144, according to society
office-bearers.
Forest officials pointed out that as per the mahazar they had
prepared in the wake of the attack the park should have only 34
survivors with valid certificate.
The Wayanad Wildlife Warden, Mr. Rajan Sehgal, the Kannur DFO,
Mr. O. Jayarajan, the Kozhikode DFO, Mr. E. Pradeepkumar, and the
Aralam Wildlife Warden, Mr. Padmanabhan, also supervised the
confiscation of animals.
The DSP, Mr. S. Gopinath, was also visited the park.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : Veerashaivas' campaign gaining momentum Next : Night driving becoming hazardous | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|