|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, December 12, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Previous
| Next
'PM remarks, NDA resolution not contradictory'
By Our Special Correspondent
NEW DELHI, DEC. 11. The Bharatiya Janata Party today defended the
Prime Minister's controversial statements on the Ram temple,
claiming that ``there was no contradiction'' between ``what he
had told the media last week'' and the assertion in the National
Democratic Alliance resolution yesterday that ``all parties to
the dispute and every political party... must accept the verdict
of the Supreme Court.''
The Prime Minister, Mr. Atal Behari Vajpayee, at an Iftaar party
hosted by his Minister, Mr. Shahnawaz Husain, had reportedly said
Hindus and Muslims could discuss and arrive at an agreement to
build the temple where it exists (at the disputed site) and a
mosque could be built at an alternative site.
At a briefing here, the party spokesperson, Mr. V. K. Malhotra,
admitted that till 1998 the BJP had said the Ayodhya dispute
could not be resolved by the courts as it was a matter of faith.
And, today's stand that the Supreme Court verdict on the issue
must be accepted by all was quite different. Even on this, he
added a rider saying that till this government's tenure ended the
BJP was committed to accept the court verdict, keeping a window
open to go back to its old stance.
The Prime Minister had not given a recipe for a way out of the
Ayodhya tangle, but had only suggested that ``if there was a
consensus'', it could be a solution, the spokesman said.
Asked about the propriety and even the constitutional correctness
of the Prime Minister's clean chit to three of his Ministers
charged with conspiring to demolish the Babri Masjid in December
1992, Mr. Malhotra admitted that the Government had the powers to
withdraw the cases. He, however, did not say why the cases were
not withdrawn if the Prime Minister who heads the CBI feels, as
he had stated, that the charges brought by the CBI were ``against
the established facts''.
The party today said the Congress was ``holding Parliament to
ransom'' and was more interested in paralysing Parliament than
discussing any issue.``We have repeatedly offered to discuss any
subject under any rule of procedure provided the notices given by
the opposition are within the framework of parliamentary rules,''
he said. The Prime Minister was also prepared to make a suo motu
statement on the issue.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Previous : What they say... Next : A cover-up, says CPI(M) | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|