|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, December 12, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Sport
| Previous
| Next
Jarman may censure Ganguly & Dahiya
KANPUR, DEC. 11. Sourav Ganguly and Vijay Dahiya will spend a
sleepless night as Match Referee Mr. Barry Jarman contemplates
the extent of damage caused by their onfield behaviour at the
Green Park here.
The fourth one-day international of the five-match series was
marred by friction between the rival players with Ganguly and
Dahiya in the thick of it. It attracted the Match Referee's
attention, who summoned the players and heard their version after
having spoken to umpires, Messrs Devendra Sharma and C.K. Sathe.
In the Code of Conduct section dealing with the players' and
officials' behaviour, Mr. Jarman found the two Indians guilty of
having violated certain rules under Clause 2, 3 and 4.
Mr. Jarman took a critical view of the manner in which Ganguly
and Dahiya appealed and tried to put pressure on umpire Mr.
Sathe. The Zimbabweans too indulged in mild acts of indiscipline
later, which seems to have been treated lightly by Mr. Jarman.
The Match Referee informed newsmen on Monday that he would
certainly take action against the players and make the
announcement on Tuesday. ``All I can tell you now is that they
have violated the Code of Conduct under Clause 2, 3 and 4 dealing
with players behaviour.''
Clause 2 deals with conduct unbecoming their status which could
bring them or the game into disrepute; clause 3 states the
players and officials must at all times accept the umpire's
decision and not show dissent while clause 4 states a player or
team official shall not verbally abuse, asssault, intimidate or
attempt to assault or initimidate any umpire, spectator, referee,
player or team official.
While Ganguly refused to comment on the episode, his counterpart
Heath Streak said, ``we are role models and need to be careful of
our behaviour.''
The will of the National selectors seemed to have prevailed in
deciding the final 11 for the match.
Unhappy with Yuveraj Singh's poor form the selectors, Mr. Chandu
Borde, chairman, and Madan Lal, made it clear to Ganguly that the
Punjab youngster had to make way for S. Sriram. The Tamil Nadu
youngster was slotted to bat at number three instead of Rahul
David on the directions of the selectors.
Ganguly, who has been backing the Punjab youngster, said ``no
comment'' when asked to speak on Yuveraj's exclusion. On the
match he observed, ``we had messed up at Jodhpur and did not want
a repeat here. The reserve swing worked well for us.''
Streak said the loss was, `disappointing' and blamed the batsmen
for the debacle. ``The shot selection was poor and we failed to
play the reverse swing well. Batting let us down,'' he noted and
added a few of the players did not like some of the decisions.
- Our Special Correspondent
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Sport Previous : Lara back to blazing best Next : Karnataka lifts trophy | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|