|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, December 13, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Previous
| Next
Making globalisation work for the poor
By Kofi A. Annan
What is globalisation? Essentially, it means that today, more
than ever in the past, groups and individuals interact directly
across frontiers, without necessarily involving the state. This
happens partly because of new technology, and partly because
states have found that prosperity is better served by releasing
the creative energies of their people than by restricting them.
The benefits of globalisation are obvious: faster growth, higher
living standards, new opportunities. Yet, a backlash has begun.
Why? Because these benefits are unequally distributed; because
the global market is not yet underpinned by rules based on shared
social objectives; and because, if all of tomorrow's poor follow
the same path that brought today's rich to prosperity, the
earth's resources will soon be exhausted. Thus the central
challenge we face today is to ensure that globalisation becomes a
positive force for all the world's people, instead of leaving
billions of them behind in squalor.
If we are to get the best out of globalisation and avoid the
worst, we must learn how to govern better at the local and
national levels, and to govern better together at the
international level. We must think afresh about how we manage our
joint activities and our shared interests, for, many challenges
that we confront today are beyond the reach of any state acting
on its own.
That does not mean world government or the eclipse of nation-
states. On the contrary, states need to be strengthened. And they
can draw strength from each other, by acting together within
common institutions based on shared rules and values.
Governments must work together to make these changes possible.
But governments alone are not going to make them happen. Much of
the heavy lifting will be done by private investment. Charitable
foundations will also be very important.
Probably all the best ideas will come from outside government -
from academic researchers, voluntary organisations, business, the
media, and indeed the arts. All of these together make up ``civil
society''. They have a vital role to play.
Last September, at the United Nations Millennium Summit, world
leaders resolved to halve the proportion of people whose income
is less than one dollar a day, the proportion of people who
suffer from hunger, and the proportion of people who are unable
to reach or to afford safe drinking water. They resolved to do
all this by 2015.
History will judge this generation by what it did to redeem that
pledge. It will judge the leaders of developing countries by
whether they enabled their people to board the train of a
transforming global economy, and made sure that everyone had at
least standing room, if not a comfortable seat. And it will judge
the rest of us by what we did to help the world's poor board that
train in good order.
Success in achieving sustained growth depends critically on
expanding access to the opportunities of globalisation. The
countries that have achieved higher growth are those that have
successfully integrated into the global economy and attracted
foreign investment.
And that in turn depends in large measure on the quality of
governance a country enjoys. Countries can only compete in the
global market if their people have the benefit of the rule of
law, with effective state institutions, transparency and
accountability in the management of public affairs, respect for
human rights, and a say in the decisions that affect their lives.
If developing countries succeed in creating the right economic
and social environment, new technology puts many things within
their reach that were previously not there. That is especially
true of information technology, which does not require vast
amounts of hardware or financial capital, or even energy. (It is
also relatively clean.) What it does require is brain power - the
one commodity that is equally distributed among the world's
peoples. So for a relatively small investment - mainly an
investment in basic education, for girls and boys alike - we can
bring all kinds of knowledge within reach of poor people, and
enable poor countries to ``leapfrog'' some of the long and
painful stages of development that others had to go through.
In short, there is much that poor countries can do to help
themselves. But rich countries have an indispensable role to
play. For them to preach the virtues of open markets to
developing countries is mere hypocrisy if they do not open their
own markets to those countries' products, or if they continue
flooding the world market with subsidised food exports, making it
impossible for farmers in poor countries to compete. Nor can they
expect developing countries to listen to their pleas to respect
the global environment, unless they are ready to alter their own
irresponsible patterns of production and consumption.
Developing countries must be enabled to export their way to
prosperity. But many of the poorest - especially in Africa - will
need a lot of help before they can do that. Everyone now agrees
that the burden of debt must be lifted from the poorest
countries. But rich countries have not yet come forward with
sufficient resources to do it.
And many countries, whether indebted or not, need help to reach
the stage where they can produce goods and services that the rest
of the world wants to buy. They need infrastructure and technical
assistance - not least in halting the spread of HIV/AIDS, now
crippling some of Africa's strongest economies. Many also need
help in resolving destructive conflicts and rebuilding a
peaceful, productive society. Long ago, all Organisation for
Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries committed
themselves to give 0.7 per cent of their gross domestic product
in development aid. Very few have lived up to that promise.
Private companies, as well as governments, have an obligation to
consider the interests of the poor, when making investment
choices and when pricing their products. They are the biggest
beneficiaries of globalisation: it is in their interest to make
it sustainable, by making it work for all.
Only when ordinary men, women and children in cities and villages
around the world can make their lives better, will we know that
globalisation is indeed becoming inclusive, allowing everyone to
share its opportunities. That is the key to eliminating world
poverty.
(The writer is Secretary-General of the United Nations.)
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Previous : Periyar agreement Next : Last chance to render justice to Bhopal victims | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|