|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, December 16, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Previous
| Next
Stiff opposition to Women's Bill
From Our Special Correspondent
NEW DELHI DEC. 15. Opposition to the Women's Reservation Bill
refuses to die down. The mere announcement of the Government's
intention to bring it up for discussion in the Lok Sabha next
week got some members agitated.
Led by Mr. Mulayam Singh Yadav, members of the Samajwadi Party,
the Rashtriya Janta Dal, and two of the BJP - allies the Samata
party and the Janata Dal (U) - said that they would go to any
length to prevent the Bill from being taken up. No sooner did the
Parliamentary Affairs Minister, Mr. Pramod Mahajan, mention that
it would a part of next week's business, Mr. Mulayam Singh Yadav
protested `` We will not allow the Bill to be introduced till it
is amended and has provisions for a sub quota for the backwards,
SC, ST and minorities''.
Accusing the Government of trying to forcibly get the Bill
passed, Mr. Yadav warned that his party would ``physically
prevent the discussion if the Government tried to force its
passage''. Encouraged by his show of defiance other MPs from the
also joined issue. There were some embarrassed faces in the
treasury benches when Mr. Raghunath Jha and Mr. Devendra Prasad
Yadav of the JD (U) and Mr. Prabhunath Singh of the Samata Party
supported Mr. Yadav. `` We will go to any extent to stop this
Bill'', said Mr. Jha.
The differences in perception on the issue within the NDA
alliance also manifested themselves with members belonging to the
Telugu Desam Party and Trinamool Congress arguing in favour of
allowing the Bill to come up for consideration. Mr. Sudip
Bandhopadhya of the Trinamool Congress appealed to his colleagues
to allow the Bill to be passed `` This will never happen '' shot
back Mr. Jha.
Attempts by Mr. Yerram Naidu to get his allies to see reason
proved futile. `` Changes can be made later but let it be passed,
'' pleaded Mr. Naidu, but his allies would have none of it.``
Unless sub quotas are included the Bill will never see the light
of the day'', said Mr. Devendra Yadav.
The Government perception, suggested outside the House later, was
that if any party wanted to bring an amendment to the Bill it
could be considered by the House at that time. ``We will bring
the Bill as it was introduced,'' Mr. Pramod Mahajan commented,
and he refused to be drawn into any argument on the merits of a
quota for backward women, or for reducing the reservation for
women from 33 per cent to 15 or 20 per cent, or the problems of
rotation of seats suggested in the Bill to which MPs cutting
across the gender barrier are opposed.
The Government view seems to be that since it is blamed for
having delayed the Bill, it will take it up and it will be for
the House to accept it or reject it. It will also show the
divisions in all parties on the Bill which MPs find personally
threatening since their seat could fall into the reserved
category.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Previous : Tariff panel asked to study flooding of Chinese goods Next : President gives assent to five Bills | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|