|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, December 16, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
U.K. fears Bush may pursue insular policy
By Hasan Suroor
LONDON, DEC. 15. While the British Government has been quick to
greet the U.S. President-elect, Mr. George W. Bush, and the Prime
Minister, Mr. Tony Blair, has said he expects Anglo-U.S.
relations to continue to ``flourish'' under him, deep down
worries remain about dealing with a Republican White House.
The main area of concern is foreign policy where the Bush
perspective is seen to differ sharply from the Blair project
which gelled so well with the Clinton administration. The U.S.
foreign policy under Mr. Bush, it is feared, would become more
``insular'' at a time when Britain sees a bigger international
role for the American-European alliance. Fears about an
``isolationist'' Washington - more focussed on its own national
interests - have been fuelled by Mr Bush's election rhetoric,
particularly his ``pledge'' to pull out of Kosovo and Bosnia. His
aides, some of whom would be deciding the new foreign policy,
have not helped matters by stating that America would not be
inclined to commit its troops abroad unless it is in its own
national interests.
This runs counter to Britain's stress on international peace-
keeping efforts in which the Clinton administration played an
active role with Europe. What Whitehall would particularly miss
is President Clinton's approach to European integration which
supported the idea of an integrated Europe working together with
America to bring peace and prosperity to the rest of the world.
``America's priorities will shift in directions that the European
Union, accustomed to Bill Clinton's enthusiasm for `European
integration' may find disconcerting'', The Times commented
editorially.
The first test of the new White House on Europe would be its
response to the European Rapid Reaction Force. Would Washington
take it on face value - an attempt by Europe to distance itself
from NATO - and leave Europe alone to handle regional conflicts
while it concentrates on the ``bigger picture''?
The answer would indicate the nature of Washington's engagement
with Europe.
The faces on Mr Bush's front-rank team - people such as the
Secretary of State and Secretary of Defence - confirm fears here
about a less internationalist White House. It is being dubbed as
the ``Cowboy White House'' which would be more inclined towards
swift ``retribution'' rather than a patient, long-term view of
the world's lingering conflicts.
An issue of immediate concern is Mr Bush's commitment to the
National Missile Defence System which has already been strongly
condemned by the British Foreign Office Minister, Mr. Peter Hain.
Foreign policy makers here are believed to be deeply opposed to
the project, particularly as it would involve installation of a
huge system in North Yorkshire. Northern Ireland is another area
where Mr Bush's approach is likely to be very different from his
predecessor's; and waters have already been muddied somewhat by
the Northern Ireland Secretary, Mr. Peter Mandelson's reported
criticism of Mr Bush's alleged pro- Republican ``bias''.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : End cross-border terrorism, Britain tells Pakistan Next : Towards a better voting system | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|