|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, December 22, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Previous
| Next
India plans 'talks about talks'
By C. Raja Mohan
NEW DELHI, DEC. 21. India and Pakistan are inching towards a
dialogue, but peace talks are unlikely to begin until the two
sides find a way to bridge their differences over the shape of
the table, say highly-placed sources in the Government.
Pakistan's insistence on ``tripartite'' talks on Kashmir -
involving India, Pakistan and the Hurriyat leadership - is said
to be the biggest remaining obstacle to the resumption of a full-
scale dialogue in the near future.
The ``exploratory steps'' India plans to initiate with Pakistan
are aimed at resolving the differences on how to structure the
dialogue. In that sense, the ``exploratory steps'' are being
described by diplomatic observers here as ``talks about talks''.
The Government is yet to make up its mind on the nature and form
of the impending pre-negotiations. There are many channels - both
formal and informal - through which ``talks about talks'' can be
conducted.
The simplest one, of course, would be through the diplomatic
missions. The High Commissioner in either country is a senior
diplomat and fully capable of negotiating with the other
Government on key issues.
The form of the conversation, however, may be less important than
the substantive differences over the question of ``tripartite''
talks. Pakistan claims that an appearance at least of a ``three-
way'' process on Jammu and Kashmir is an important face saver
domestically for its future engagement with India.
New Delhi has already rejected the concept of ``tripartite''
talks. India can in no way countenance its own citizens sitting
at a negotiating table with another nation. Further, New Delhi
cannot accept the proposition that the Hurriyat is the sole
representative of the popular opinion in Jammu and Kashmir.
India, however, is ready to begin parallel talks on Kashmir - one
with Pakistan and the other with the various groups in Kashmir,
including the Hurriyat. But New Delhi, sources here insist, will
never accept a table for three.
According to diplomatic observers here, the way out may lie in
the possibility of opening a third track of talks between
Pakistan and the Hurriyat. The Government has already hinted that
it may let those Kashmiri leaders who want to engage Pakistan
travel there. The Hurriyat could always hold talks with India
separately.
Beyond the differences over the shape of the table, there is the
residual question of cross-border terrorism. The Prime Minister,
Mr. Atal Behari Vajpayee, acknowledged in Parliament yesterday a
discernible reduction in some aspects of cross-border terrorism
during the last few weeks of ceasefire.
But he also pointed to the current unacceptable levels of
infiltration and violence and made a specific reference to the
continuing terrorist activity by the jehadi groups in Jammu and
Kashmir.
India cannot begin and conduct a serious dialogue with Pakistan
in an atmosphere in which Islamabad is free to foment violence in
Kashmir through the jehadi groups. Pakistan's claim that it has
no control over these groups enjoys little credibility here.
India would want Pakistan to rein in the jehadi groups before the
talks begin.
No one in the Government is willing to specify a timeframe for
concluding the proposed ``talks about talks''. But analysts here
say it will be at least a month or two before the two sides
complete the exploratory phase, which could then lead to a
resumption of the dialogue.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Previous : When women MPs laid siege to PM Next : Let them go ahead with the probe: Sonia | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|