|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, December 23, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Sport
| Previous
| Next
She changed the history of women's chess
THERE IS no river in Beijing. She would have been happy if there
was one. But there is a river in the middle of the Chinese
chessboard. Xie Jun swam across it early in her life and moved to
the more traditional variety of chess, and has lived to celebrate
that decision. She made a big splash in 1991, when she did a
`Kramnik' to Maya Chiburdanidze in the World title match.
Last week in New Delhi she won her fourth World championship.
This time her triumph was as expected as an Australian cricket
team winning the Test. Throughout the tournament, only one woman
played that kind of chess. She lives in riverless Beijing.
Xie Jun played splendidly for three weeks, remaining unbeaten
after 16 games. She was new to the knock-out system, but she got
used to it pretty soon. ``Personally I would prefer the old
system,'' she said at the end of the championship.
In the very first round, she was stretched to the tie-breakers by
a determined and elegant Svetlana Matveeva of Russia. But the
World champion asserted her supremacy within the first set of
rapid games (of 25 minutes each). She was taken to the tie-
breakers only once more, by another Russian, Ekaterina
Kovalevskaya in the semifinals.
Xie Jun had no real trouble in the final against compatriot Qin
Kanying, the 26-year-old who surprised everyone at New Delhi.
There was, however, one problem for the champion. Kanying's
present trainer, Peng Xiaomin, was her second earlier. But she
overcame that difficulty in style. She worked harder on the
openings - interestingly all the four games were Ruy Lopez, but
different variations - and in the crucial first game, she came up
with a novelty (a move that was not played before in a similar
situation). That move (17. c4) had a big impact on the outcome of
the match. Kanying, though she tried hard and fought grimly,
could never recover.
Xie Jun's domination of the World champion was complete. She came
up with the right moves at the right times right through the
tournament. For instance, in the first rapid game of the
semifinals, when Kovalevskaya tried to put her under pressure
with a premature attack on the king-side, she produced a
brilliant rook move and set up a victory. She had taken half of
her time on that move, but after it was executed, there was no
escape for the Russian, one of the major surprises of the World
championship.
``Yes, I liked that win, but the one I liked more was that win
against Natalia Zhukova,'' she said. She was referring to her win
in the first game of the quarterfinals against the talented
Ukrainian with the help of a brilliant knight sacrifice.
``Xie Jun was very solid and consistent,'' said Nana Alexandria,
the Georgian who twice challenged for the World title. ``She
definitely deserved to be the World champion again.''
``Xie Jun's games were really impressive at the World
championship,'' said Bhagyashree Thipsay, the Indian veteran who
put up a determined fight before losing to the Netherlands'
higher rated Peng Zhaoqin in the first round. ``I was watching
the games live on the internet, and was able to guess the moves
of most players correctly. Even the moves made by the men players
did not surprise me at all. But Xie Jun was highly unpredictable;
often I failed to guess her moves.''
In New Delhi she was also proving a point to Zsuzsa Polgar, who
had defeated her in the World title match in 1996. The Hungarian
refuses to consider her as a World champion and there has been a
war of words on the internet between the two. ``I am ready to
play her any moment, and I deeply regret that I did not get a
revenge match against her,'' she told this writer during the
party following the closing ceremony of the World championship.
That loss in Spain was the only occasion when she lost her crown
since 1991. She, 21 and unheard of, had shocked the world when
she dethroned the five-time champion Maya. ``It took me a while
to believe that I had indeed become the World champion,'' she
said. ``My whole life changed after that. I was recognised on the
streets, people wanted to congratulate me. It felt great.''
Xie Jun defended her title in 1993, when she crushed Nana
Isoliani, another Georgian (``Yes, that was my easiest win in
World championship''). Then last year in Shenyang she regained
the title, overcoming Russia's Alisa Galliamova in a gruelling
battle, which ended in a 8.5-6.5 victory for her after 15 games
(``That was pretty tough and easily my most difficult match'').
Xie Jun has men's Grandmaster title and has an impressive rating
of 2568. More importantly, she deserves that rating and plays
like a true Grandmaster.
She was advised to take up chess seriously when one of her
earlier trainers found that she was talented. When she was 14,
she won the Chinese national junior championship, winning all her
games. She tied for the second place in the World junior
championship in 1988 in Adelaide and never looked back.
She also changed the history of Chinese women's chess. She
inspired many young girls to take up the game and today China is
the undisputed super power in women's chess.
``Now my task is much easier,'' she said. ``There are so many
talented girls back in China to take the game forward. I am even
thinking of retiring,'' she said, flashing that innocent smile
again.
But, she was just joking (the lady has a fine sense of humour).
The female chess players of the world will have to wait for some
more time before they could start breathing a bit easier.
P. K. AJITH KUMAR
Kozhikode
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Sport Previous : Unbeaten run to the final Next : Warne looking good, says Border | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|