|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, December 26, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Syrian presence thins out in Beirut
By Kesava Menon
BEIRUT, DEC. 25.For a few days in the beginning of this month,
the big news here was that the Syrian troops had pulled out of
Lebanon's capital. Then the press took another look and concluded
that not all of them were gone. But the Syrian presence has
definitely thinned out and, more remarkably, the Lebanese have
begun publicly stating the view that the nature of their
country's relationship with Syria should be reviewed.
Syrian soldiers were definitely far more visible in the streets
of Beirut a few months ago than they are now. They, and their
star-emblazoned pill boxes, can still be seen adjacent to the
war-battered buildings where they are billeted. But the few
Syrian soldiers that can be seen in these buildings are on sentry
duty suggesting that they are mainly here till the remains of
their gear can be shifted and the concomitant administrative mess
cleared. Their presence is far more pronounced in numbers and
activity in the Beqaa Valley. All told, the Syrians do seem to be
implementing the terms of the Taif accord that they should
relocate to the Beqaa.
The Syrian troop redeployment occurred after, or simultaneously
with, demands to this effect aired by Lebanese religious and
political figures. The Maronite Archbishop Rev. Nasrallah Btrous
Sfeir, has been the most vocal of those who voiced the demand but
he was also joined by Mr. Walid Jumblatt, the Druze leader who
has been close to the Syrian leadership in the past. Some of the
leading lights of Lebanese journalism also expressed similar
sentiments.
These pronouncements reveal the sense of confidence that sections
of the Lebanese society have begun to feel after the leadership
change in Syria. There is a sense that Syria's President, Dr.
Bashar al Assad, does not yet have the ability to control events
in this country in the same manner as his father did and also a
belief that he is not inclined that way either. (After all, Dr.
Bashar did not intervene in the recent parliamentary elections or
in the choice of Prime Minister to the same degree as the Syrian
leadership was won't to do in the past). But the Syrian troop
redeployment was surely not induced solely by the comments from
the Lebanese leaders.
The ending of Israel's occupation of southern Lebanon in May this
year had some bearing on the Syrian decision, diplomats here
believe. So long as Israel maintained a threatening military
posture inside Lebanon there was merit in the Syrian position
that they had to keep their soldiers in all parts of their host
country to ensure its protection. This position has now obviously
become unviable to an extant.
Its army's overwhelming presence in Lebanon was also injecting
some awkwardness in Syria's conduct of foreign policy. Syria's
economy is not in a rosy condition and they have begun out of
their traditional isolation and seeking closer engagement with
the rest of the world. Pointed criticism of their presence in
Lebanon is something Syria can do without. The Pope, who
supported the Rev. Sfeir's call, was the latest to echo what some
other European leaders (those of Italy and France in particular)
have been saying for some time. Then, of course, the U.S.
administration is not exactly overjoyed that Syria keeps a part
of its army in Lebanon.
Some analysts here believe that the Syrians would like to thin
out their presence in this country on calculations of their
domestic interests as well. The young conscripts in their army
may be easily influenced by the relatively more liberal political
and social atmosphere of Lebanon. The Syrian leadership might be
preparing itself for greater openness with the rest of the world.
But they want to do so at their own pace and do not want to be
hustled by forces they cannot control.
All said and done, however, the bed-rock on which Syria bases its
influence over Lebanon continues. Its apparatus for maintaining
that influence has been never as visible as its uniformed
personnel. That apparatus has not been dismantled.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Wahid decries bid to weaken Govt. Next : Curbs on Taliban: Britain has reservations | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|