|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, December 29, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Palestinian refugees face hard choices
By Kesava Menon
AMMAN, DEC. 28. For the large number of Palestinian refugees in
Jordan, this Eid is going to be a memorable one and not for the
most positive of reasons.
Although the negotiations with Israel are going through last
minute glitches as both sides try hard to achieve the best
possible results for themselves, it is reasonably clear that this
is the final stage. Palestinian refugees in this country and
other parts of the world will soon have to decide whether they
should cling on to a dream which will probably soon become an
impossible one or assess how they can make the best of the
bargain that will be made.
Since they were ousted from their ancestral villages in 1948,
many Palestinian refugees have placed faith in the international
guarantees that they would be allowed to return. During the past
seven years during which they have been negotiating with Israel,
as per the format of the Oslo agreements, officials of the
Palestinian Authority have insisted that the right (of the
refugees) to return is a non-compromisable principle. The
officials had probably realised early on that this objective
would be very difficult to achieve if not impossible. Yet, they
continued to emphasise the immutability of the principle if for
no other reason than to buttress their demands on the other
issues in contention.
After the latest round of negotiations in Washington, and the
drafting of bridging proposals by the U.S. administration, it
appears that the Palestinian Authority is being asked to trade
off the right to return in exchange for full sovereignty over
Arab East Jerusalem. Israel had so far taken the position that
they would concede neither the right to return nor full
sovereignty over East Jerusalem to the Palestinians. Now they are
prepared to hand over full sovereignty in East Jerusalem provided
the Palestinian Authority drops its demand on the right to
return.
A few proposals have been added on to make it easier for the
Palestinian Authority to swallow the idea of forsaking the right
to return. There is talk of an Israeli apology for the ethnic
cleansing they carried out in 1948 and a hefty monetary
compensation. Israel is also likely to drop its traditional
objection to the prospect of refugees returning to the occupied
Palestinian territories. But there are very serious problems
still to be resolved.
Countries which had accepted the refugees in 1948 are not willing
to let them settle permanently. The Palestinians have found it
relatively easier to assimilate themselves into the Jordanian
society. In fact, the Hashemite monarchy in this country has made
some effort to incorporate the Palestinians into a composite
Jordanian identity. But Syria, and especially Lebanon, are not
prepared to absorb the Palestinians as full- fledged citizens.
Theoretically, these refugees may now be able to shift themselves
to the West Bank and Gaza Strip but a whole lot of attendant
issues have to be settled prior to that - how will water
resources be re-allocated between Israel and the Palestinian
Authority to cater for the expected influx; who is going to foot
the bill for compensation to the refugees etc.
From what the Palestinian chief negotiator, Mr. Saeeb Erekat, has
disclosed, it appears that the Authority is seeking
clarifications on all these issues. But there is an unmistakable
feeling that the Authority has realised that a major compromise
on the right to return is the price they will have to pay for a
final agreement. Israel is adamant that it cannot concede the
right to return since an influx of Palestinians would inevitably
transform the Jewish character of their state. This point of view
appears to have the strong backing of the U.S. administration.
For the Palestinian Authority, the problem is double- fold. They
have to ensure that in compromising on the right to return, they
get such compensation in monetary and other terms that re-
settlement of the refugees in Palestine or elsewhere is viable.
They then have to sell the deal to their people who have
not really been prepared for it. For the Palestinian refugees who
have been dreaming of returning to their ancestral homes this is
one of the most emotionally distressing moments of their lives.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : China opens door for contacts with Taiwan Next : Barak cancels meeting with Arafat | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|