|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, December 29, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Business
| Previous
| Next
Task force for protection of minority shareholders
By Our Legal Correspondent
NEW DELHI, DEC. 28. The task force on corporate excellence on a
sustained basis to sharpen India's global competitive edge has
recommended the introduction of the concept of `interested
shareholders' in the scheme of voting on resolutions by
shareholders.
In its report, the task force, headed by Mr. S. Rajagopalan,
former chairman of Mahanagar Telephone Nigam (MTNL), has said
that the basic character of the joint stock corporation where
voting rights are proportionate to the voting capital held should
be retained. However, the proposed `interested shareholders'
concept would require all shareholders requiring individually or
in groups or categories benefiting from a proposed resolution to
the exclusion of other shareholders, to abstain from voting on
such resolutions.
Elaborating further, the report said that to ensure that this
provision was not abused by a handful of vested interests, its
operation should be limited to specific matters such as selective
preferential issues of equity shares, setting up competing
ventures and buy-back of shares where a majority or dominant
shareholder group stands to benefit.
The report said that these provisions should be made applicable
to cases where the `interested shareholders' constitute 76 per
cent or less of the total shareholding by par value.
To ensure transparency in the working of the companies, the task
force has favoured that the annual reports of listed companies
should disclose whether any agreement existed between dominant or
controlling shareholder groups the benefits of which would not be
available to all the shareholders.
The task force has suggested that a wholetime or managing
director of a listed company should be disqualified for
appointment for three years if the listed company was categorised
as a defaulting company by the proposed National Listing
Authority or the Securities and Exchange Board of India or
designated stock exchanges.
According to the panel good corporate governance required a
continuing effort at self evaluation and improvement and there
was need for companies to undertake a periodic corporate health
check either internally or with professional help to ensure that
there was adequate and early diagnosis of symptoms leading to a
quest for improvement. Corporate governance insofar as it
reflected the responsibility of the board of directors must not
only be effective but also non-invasive.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Business Previous : Digital Future, 3 Bharti cos. among new FDI proposals Next : Indian Bank recovers Rs. 300 cr. of NPAs | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|