|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, December 29, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Entertainment
| Next
The fiend does a turn-about
SINCE ITS first publication in 1957, Dr. Seuss's classic tale,
``How The Grinch Stole Christmas'' has captivated readers young
and old alike with its delightful story, endearing characters,
witty humour and timeless message. For decades, Hollywood film
makers have tried in vain to secure the motion picture rights for
a live- action production of one of Dr. Seuss' books, as Theodor
S. Geisel (Dr. Seuss) had repeatedly turned down their requests.
Until now.
Why is the Grinch so, well ... so Grinchy? Nobody knows.
How the Grinch Stole Christmas is a depressing reminder that when
Hollywood decides to lavish more than $100 million on a beloved
children's story, that money has to go somewhere. The movie is so
clogged with kooky gadgetry and special effects and glitter and
goo that watching it feels like being gridlocked at Toys ``R'' Us
during the Christmas rush. Both the film and its omnivorous star,
Jim Carrey, who seems to change voices every few seconds, come at
you from so many directions at once that half the time you don't
know where to look or how to react.
Mr. Carrey's wrinkled green-faced Grinch is relentless.
Determined at all costs to be recognisable through his furry
costume, the star regularly breaks character to address the
camera and fire off smart-aleck remarks and references like
``dude'' and ``faaabulous.'' These showoff antics may lend the
movie a contemporary edge, but their underlying cynicism is a
profoundly corrupting influence.
The moral of the original tale says that Christmas cannot be
bought in a store. Although the film dutifully peddles the same
message, here it is all but buried under the tonnage of junk ad
gimmickry, saccharine music (by James Horner) and a story that
portrays the residents of Whoville as pig-snouted toy people who
are almost as selfish and mean- spirited as the Grinch himself.
Once upon a time (in 1957, to be exact) there appeared a slender
children's book of line drawings and clever verses that playfully
fused the enchanted tone of ``A Visit From St. Nicholas'' (better
known as ``The Night Before Christmas'') with the message of
Dicken's ``Christmas Carol.'' In this captivating fable, ``How
the Grinch Stole Christmas'', a hirsute Scrooge-like sourpuss
loathes Christmas so much he decides to ruin it for the happy
residents of Whoville.
Descending from his lair atop Mount Crumpit in a sleigh driven by
his dog, Max (with attached reindeer horns), he impersonates
Santa Claus on Christmas Eve, dives down the town's chimneys and
makes off with everyone's presents. When a little girl named
Cindy Lou catches sight of him stealing a Christmas tree, he lies
and tells her he's only taking it away to fix a broken light.
But the next morning, when the Grinch finds the Whovillians still
singing their songs of holiday joy, he gives in to the Christmas
spirit, returns their goodies and ends up in Whoville
magnanimously carving up the ``roast beast'' he had stolen.
With minimal fiddling, the book was turned into a delightful
animated short in 1966 narrated by Boris Karloff, who intoned the
rhymes of the author, Theodor S. Geisel, with just the right
mixture of Lionel Barrymore-esque gravity and Grinchlike
creepiness. Here, Anthony Hopkins, who supplies the narration,
inflects the verses with a slight tang of Hannibal Lecter.
It's not Mr. Hopkins's fault that the poetry now seems clumsily
shoehorned into the movie to supply obligatory credibility. Amid
all the wisecracks, pyrotechnics and action-adventure=paced
frolic, Geisel's deft, witty rhymes often seem extraneous, and
even anachronistically out of place. In the movie's fitful
attempts to illustrate the verse, it does grating things like
taking a funny nonsensical rhyme (from a ditty in the animated
film) about the Grinch having termites in his smile and flashing
a horror-movie image of the Grinch's teeth crawling with
termites.
The fable itself is so slender that to become a feature-length
film it had to be pumped up with a background story. Thus we see
the Grinch as an infant foundling deposited in a basket on a
Whoville doorstep. An ornery, rebellious child, ridiculed for
looking different, he is mercilessly taunted by his peers and
eventually flees Whoville to settle in a garbage-littered cave
atop Mount Crumpit.
The new story gives him a childhood crush on the snooty but
beauteous Martha May Whovier (Christine Baranski), who in her
vanity and avarice is almost as objectionable as the Grinch
himself. We also meet Whoville's pompous chief executive, Mayor
May Who (Jeffrey Tambor), whose royal pretensions are evidenced
by his fondness for ermine-trimmed Henry VII-style robes.
Virtue in Whoville is personified by Cindy Lou (Taylor Momsen), a
pretty, pigtailed little girl, whose character has been blown up
from a walk-on into an adorable little angel and the only
resident of Whoville who sees good inside the Grinch. When this
fearless child pays visits to the Grinch, he tries to scare her
off. But all his combative huffing and puffing only make her
laugh. On top of its banal psychologizing about the poor,
persecuted little Grinch, the sentimentalizing of Cindy Lou Who
is the movie's final corrupting straw.
Every so often, beneath the layers of gadgetry and glitter and
its two million feet of Styrofoam (according to the production
notes), you can glimpse what might have been an enchanted family
movie. But if the quasi-medieval architecture, inventive costumes
and goofy hairdos and snouts create a storybook atmosphere, the
screen is so densely packed with stuff that it all tends to melt
into a jumble.
Although ``The Grinch'' was directed by the usually sensible Ron
Howard, it doesn't feel like one of his films. Throughout, one
senses an underlying tension between his desire to make a
warmhearted holiday movie and the need to magnify the personality
of its star. Mr. Carrey's ability to penetrate his character's
disguise and get away with his usual mugging and clowning is
technically no small accomplishment. In the right situations, Mr.
Carrey may be a comic genius. But here is ferocity is largely
misdirected. Aided and abetted by the producers' desperate,
anything-for-an-effect aesthetic of excess, the star ends up
hijacking the film.
Dr. Seuss's ``How the Grinch Stole Christmas'' is rated PG
(Parental Guidance suggested). Very young children might be
frightened by the Grinch in his monstrous moments.
New York Times
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Entertainment Next : Film Review: Manuneedhi | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|