|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, January 21, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Previous
| Next
No date set for temple at dharam sansad
By Neena Vyas
ALLAHABAD, JAN. 20. It was not a bang but a whimper. There was no
announcement at the `dharam sansad' here of a date for the start
of construction of a Ram temple at Ayodhya. There was no threat
to occupy by force the land acquired by the Centre in and around
the disputed site.
After all the hype, the Vishwa Hindu Parishad-led `dharam sansad'
adopted a resolution today, warning ``all relevant
organisations'' to ``remove all hurdles in the way of the
construction of a Sri Ram temple at the Ramjanmabhoomi by March
12, 2002, the day of Mahashivatri.''
It was a climbdown that left many VHP cadres disappointed. But
the leadership has worked out a programme to keep them busy -
chanting of the name of Ram is to be organised in villages from
November 26. From September 18 to October 16 jalabhishek is to be
offered in temples. A `sant yatra' (procession of sadhus) to be
taken out from Ayodhya to Delhi between February 18 and 25, 2002
will serve notice on Parliament and the Government to remove
hurdles to the temple construction.
For the last two days the VHP leadership had been saying a firm
date for the start of construction of the temple would be
announced. But apparently, a strong message from the RSS and the
BJP to do nothing to destabilise the Vajpayee Government spoilt
the broth that was cooking in the VHP pot. In addition, at a
meeting with the Puri Sankaracharya, Nischalanand Saraswathi,
yesterday, the VHP leadership was forced to give him an assurance
that no date would be announced without consulting the
Sankaracharyas if the VHP wanted their ``blessings''.
The Puri Sankaracharya indicated today that he might call a
meeting of the most respected dharmacharyas, vallabhacharyas,
nimkacharyas, ramanadacharyas, madhavacharyas and others on
January 22 on the Kumbh Mela grounds here to discuss the issue.
The Sankaracharya of the Jyotishpeeth and Dwarkapeeth,
Swaroopanand Saraswathi, and the Kanchi Kamakotipeeth, Sri
Jayendra Saraswati, would be part of this meeting, he indicated.
The Puri Sankaracharya said if the `sants' were to fix a date for
the start of construction of a temple, that ``right'' would
naturally be that of the Sankaracharyas whose peeths are the
oldest established religious maths.
The `dharam sansad' witnessed only thin attendance by the sadhus
and `mahants.' The `pandal', where it was held, was crowded
mostly by VHP and Bajrang Dal workers.
The Puri Sankaracharya also said today that the proposed meeting
of dharmacharyas had been advanced from January 24 to January 22,
as January 24 was a big bathing day at the Mela and the
dharmacharyas would be busy with their rituals.
`VHP not interested in politics'
Earlier, Mr. Praveen Togadia, VHP general secretary, told the
press that what the VHP wanted was legislation from the
Government to enable the building of the Ram temple, as was done
for the Somnath temple.
Mr. Togadia claimed that the VHP was not interested in politics.
``We do not care who gets the crown and who loses it,'' he said
in response to questions on the consequences for the Vajpayee
Government if they were to start the construction of the temple.
PM refuses to comment
PTI reports from New Delhi:
The Prime Minister, Mr. Atal Behari Vajpayee, today did not
respond to media queries on the Dharam Sansad setting a deadline
for removing all obstacles to the temple construction.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Previous : Bush sworn in 43rd U.S. President amid hopes Next : Muslim law board meet to discuss Ayodhya issue | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|