|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, January 21, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Features
| Previous
| Next
Oasis in a parched land
MAHUR village (Purandhar block of Pune district) is an oasis in
this parched, drought-prone district of Maharashtra. From the top
of a hillock, green fields can be seen for miles around. At the
base of the hillock is a small irrigation tank into which
rainwater is harvested. This almost perennially full waterbody is
the lifeline of the village and the principle of equity in water
distribution its sustenance.
In a country where rural people - failing to get returns from
their agricultural lands - are migrating to the big cities in
search of jobs, in the 30-odd villages where Vilasrao Salunkhe's
pani panchayats are in operation, reverse migration has begun.
Farms that were barely yielding 50 kgs of bajra and jawar per
acre and an annual income Rs. 2,500-4,000 now yield Rs. 10,000-
1,00,000. In addition to traditional cereals, farmers grow wheat,
onions, vegetables, a variety of flowers like marigolds and
lilies, fruits and a cash crop which is not a water guzzler. The
villagers practise organic farming and employ people from
adjoining villages.
The man who pioneered these radical technological and social
innovations, that repair and restore degraded water sheds and
guarantee each family within the community an equal share of the
water harvested, is an engineer with his own factory. In 1972,
after the terrible drought that affected some 4,00,000 people in
Maharashtra, Salunkhe realised the need to intervene.
There was no water available for agriculture. Drinking water was
scarce and tankers supplied water only for basic needs.
Travelling extensively, he saw villagers breaking stones for road
construction in a desperate bid to earn a subsistence allowance
from the government.
He realised that environmental regeneration and watershed
development with community participation was the only solution.
Rainfall in this region fluctuated between 250 mm and 500 mm. At
first, tried out his idea on a 16-hectare plot on the hillside of
Naigaon village. The land belonged to the temple trust but was
barren and uncultivable. Salunkhe took the land from the trust on
a 50-year lease and built a hut where he and his family lived and
worked with the community.
Conserving soil and harvesting water was given top priority. A
series of contour bunds was raised to trap water and check soil
erosion. At the base of the hill, which he saw as a micro
watershed, a percolation tank that could hold a million cubic
feet of water was constructed.
A well was dug below and water pumped from there up the hill
slope to irrigate the fields. Trees were planted in rocky areas;
fruit trees in the more fertile areas and grass and shrubs on
lands not being cultivated. Slowly production increased. As
against two to four bags of grain a year, 100 quintals was
harvested and enough employment was generated forthe surival of
five households and their cattle. Half an acre of irrigated land
could provide a man's food needs for a year.
The Naigaon experiment was ready for duplication in other parts
of the State. Water was a common property resource with all
villagers having equal rights and access to it. So the five basic
principles of the pani panchayats or Gram Gaurav Prathistan were
evolved, and they are in operation till today.
* Irrigation schemes are undertaken for groups of farmers, rather
than for individuals. Water is allocated on the basis of the
number of family members rather than in proportion to land
holding. A family of five is given water rights to irrigate one
hectare.
* Cropping is restricted to seasonal crops with low water
requirement. Crops that require perennial irrigation and large
amounts of water, like sugarcane, banana and turmeric, cannot be
cultivated in the pani panchayat areas.
* Water rights are not attached to land rights. If land is sold,
water rights revert back to the farmers' collective.
* All members of community, including the landless, have right to
water.
* The beneficiaries of the panchayat have to bear 20 per cent of
the cost of scheme. They have to plan, administer and manage the
scheme and distribute water in an equitable manner.
With farmers paying 20 per cent of the cost of lift irrigation,
the Government provided another 50 per cent and the remaining 30
per cent was provided by the pani panchayat as an interest-free
loan.
The half-a-dozen landless people of Mahur, who have joined the
scheme, have taken land on lease from landholders and put their
quota of water to good use. They have prospered and now some have
bought land too.
In the early 1980s, when the cloth mill where the villagers
worked closed down, they came together to form their water
panchayat. Ten to 15 per cent of the villagers who already had
irrigated land did not join the scheme. People living on the
hilltop where water could not be reached also stayed away.
"Where the cost of development does not ensure returns, villagers
have not joined in," says Lakshman Khedar, who works closely with
Salunkhe to ensure that the scheme stays on line. Though the
region receives close to 1100 mm of rain annually, there was no
storage facility, villagers recall.
Today, it is wonderful to see the prosperity of Ramachandra
Sripathi Chavan, one of Mahur's early beneficiaries of the pani
panchayat scheme. The old mud hut in which he lived till the
1980s now serves as the godown for his crop of onions. A solid
two-roomed cement house with galvanised iron sheets on the roof
is his new abode. A television set has been given pride of place.
Of the four acres of land that he and his brother own, two acres
are now irrigated through lift irrigation. Earlier he was
dependent on the rains and grew just bajra and jawar. He was able
to harvest just 5-6 quintals in a year and earned just Rs. 2,500.
Today he grows a mix of crops and his income has soared.
Others from the village recount similar success stories. Niranjan
Ganpat Rao Chavan and his brother have 12 acres of land. Now
under the pani panchayat scheme 4.5 acres is irrigated. Earlier,
he grew groundnuts in the rainy season and bajra, jawar and rice
earning Rs. 5,000-6,000 a year. Now he grows mogra, marigold and
lilies in addition to wheat and vegetables and earn Rs. 70,000 an
acre of irrigated land. Niranjan who worked in Pune returned in
1987, as did Satyawan Gole.
Balasahib Chavan and his brother own 11 acres of land of which
three acres are under the pani panchayat. Balasahib, who studied
till Std. XII, is the village patkari, the man who operates the
lift irrigation scheme, bills the villagers, collects payment and
ensures that each member of the panchayat gets his due share of
water. The pumps operate round the clock and Balasahib ensures
that each acre gets water for three hours continuously. Though
there is load shedding in the area, it is not as bad as in Uttar
Pradesh, the villagers pointed out.
Balasahib was trained in motor repair at Sashwath before taking
charge in Mahur. He gets a salary of Rs. 1,500 as patkari. Every
member of the panchayat contributes Rs. 1,000 a year towards
maintenance. Balasahib who earned Rs. 8,000-9,000 a year from his
land now earns Rs. 2 lakhs a year. What is more, he has a special
status in the village.
Bharat Gole has four acres of land of which one acre is
irrigated. His was wasteland and, before he joined the panchayat,
the returns was barely Rs. 1,000 a year. Now he earns Rs. 15,000
annually.
In Mahur, grazing is restricted to certain areas. Everyone in the
village has one or two buffaloes or cows. Some milk is kept aside
for the family's needs and the rest is sold to help supplement
family income. With increased grass and water in the area, milk
yields have increased.
While it is remarkable that the project has been sustained for a
quarter of a century despite the strict terms of sharing and
equity, it has not been replicated as extensively as it should
have.
According to Salunkhe, the 50 per cent Government subsidy for
water harvesting has stopped. This means the farmers have to pay
more as their share for lift irrigation. Water harvesting was
also possible only in those areas where the landscape provided
the slopes required for contour bunding and water collection.
USHA RAI
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Features Previous : Hero by name and deed Next : Investigating thyroid cancer | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|