|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, February 06, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Election may not bring political stability
By Kesava Menon
TEL AVIV, FEB. 5. There are several absurd aspects to the special
Prime Ministerial election that is being held in Israel on
Tuesday. Among the most absurd is the fact that whoever wins the
poll will find it very difficult to cobble together a coalition
in Parliament that can pass the budget by March 31. If the budget
is not passed by that date it will necessitate a fresh election.
If the opinion polls hold true and the front-runner, Mr. Ariel
Sharon, wins he could either build a coalition composed solely of
the hardline right-wing parties or reach out across the political
divide and form a national unity Government. Since the hard-right
has swung solidly behind Mr. Sharon, they would be most upset if
he does not follow their agenda in his dealings with the
Palestinians and on issues of domestic politics. Mr. Sharon's
problem is that the right-wing parties, though sharing some views
in common, are bitterly divided on others.
Most of the right-wing parties want an end, or at least an
indefinite freezing, of negotiations with the Palestinians.
However, Shas, the party of the Jews who immigrated from the
African and Asian countries, does not traditionally take a very
hard position on the Palestinian issue provided their partisan
concerns are taken care of. Besides the special funding for their
educational network, what this party which has a large bloc in
Parliament, is most interested in is more strict enforcement of
religious codes. Other religious parties in Mr. Sharon's putative
coalition share this concern.
If Mr. Sharon succumbs to the wishes of the religious parties on
matters of observance he is likely to run afoul of the two
Russian parties which together have a significant parliamentary
presence. Currently, the two Russian parties support a tough
approach towards the Palestinians but they are just as vehemently
opposed to the imposition of strict religious codes. In the
immediate aftermath of the election, if Mr. Sharon wins, the
focus would be on the Palestinian front but the differences over
religious matters are bound to rise as the budgetary allocations
are being decided.
Although it is not being shouted from the roof-tops, there is a
widespread expectation here that Mr. Sharon would try and form a
national unity government centred on his own Likud party and the
Labour party and taking in centrist groups. The Labour party
leader and current Prime Minister, Mr. Ehud Barak, has declared
that he will not lead his party into a national unity government
that includes extremist parties. But he has tantalisingly left
open the possibility of joining a government that does not
include such parties.
While the prospect of a national unity government, under either
of the two leaders, is being looked on with general favour, it is
difficult to see how such a government can last any length of
time. The differences between Labour and Likud, in regard to the
specific issues being negotiated with the Palestinians, are so
sharp as to be almost unbridgeable.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Poll outcome appears certain Next : U.S. strategy to isolate China on NMD | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|