|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, February 17, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Previous
| Next
'Hard' Budget will be a deception: CPI(M)
By Our Staff Reporter
VISAKHAPATNAM, FEB. 15. The Communist Party of India (Marxist)
has said any decision to present a `hard' Union Budget, citing
funds for relief and rehabilitation for the quake-hit Gujarat as
the reason, would amount to `deception.'
Addressing a press conference here on Friday, Mr. Sitaram
Yechuri, CPI(M) politburo member, said there were indications
that the Centre was attempting hard measures on the pretext of
Gujarat but its ulterior motive was to plug the fiscal deficit.
While the damage caused by the earthquake had been estimated at
Rs. 21,000 crores, the Centre had not given any account of the
financial aid that had flowed in from various quarters, including
international financial agencies like the World Bank and the ADB.
Any hard measure, without revealing the quantum of aid received,
would be `anti-people.'
The Centre should instead focus on recovering the outstanding
dues in Income Tax, Central Excise and Customs Duty to meet the
deficit. ``The Finance Minister had himself disclosed in
Parliament that the outstanding dues amounted to Rs.62,000
crores, of which corporate tax alone had a share of Rs.28,000
crores. The amount is three times the estimated damage in
Gujarat,'' Mr. Yechuri said.
His party also wanted two per cent surcharge on Income Tax to be
based on a graded system to spare the tax-payers in the `lower-
end' segment.
Mr. Yechuri warned that the domestic industry, particularly
agriculture, would suffer if the Centre went ahead with its
decision to lift quantitative restrictions on the proposed 714
items. The WTO had set 2003 as the deadline for such measures but
the Government was rushing through them, apparently under
pressure from the U.S. Seeking increase in import tariff to
protect the domestic industry, he cited the example of Japan
which had imposed 2,000 per cent import duty on rice.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Previous : Budget session: Cong. to pursue aggressive line Next : Pak. releases fishermen | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|