|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, February 23, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Next
Don't mess with peace, PM warns jehadis
By Harish Khare
NEW DELHI, FEB. 22. The Centre today formally announced its
decision to extend the ceasefire in Jammu and Kashmir by three
more months. The current ceasefire, which was to have expired on
February 26, now stands extended till the end of May, 2001.
As per the widely reported decision taken yesterday by the
Cabinet Committee on Security, the Prime Minister, Mr. Atal
Behari Vajpayee, made a statement in the Lok Sabha, spelling out
the Government's thinking behind the ``peace initiative''.
Unfortunately, because of a procedural stalemate, no statement
could be made in the Rajya Sabha; hence, the Government was
deprived of its option of offering ``clarifications'' and
elucidations of the statement made in the Lok Sabha.
In his statement, the Prime Minister recalled that the
President's address to the joint sitting of both the Houses on
the opening day of the budget session, contained ``the
Government's approach to the whole question of Jammu and
Kashmir''.
Confident tone
The overall tone of Mr. Vajpayee's statement was of a confident
Government convinced of its game-plan. At least, three operative
elements could be clearly discerned. First, Mr. Vajpayee told the
Lok Sabha that ``the Government has decided to pursue this path
(of readiness to have talks with every group in the State that
abjures violence) by initiating talks with various groups in
Jammu and Kashmir''. According to officials, this formulation
could only mean that sooner than later the Centre would be
``formalising'' some kind of format to ``engage those groups and
voices which are outside the mainstream''.
A necessary corollary of this decision would be to allow the All-
Party Hurriyat Conference delegation visit Pakistan. Though there
was no discussion on this specific point in yesterday's CCS
meeting, the presumption is that the APHC's much-hyped visit
could come about in near future.
Second, the Prime Minister asserted that ``we will not let this
(peace) process be derailed, diluted or misused''. Without
mentioning by name jehadi outfits such as the Laskhar-e-Taiba or
the Jaish-e-Mohammed, Mr. Vajpayee's statement contained a tough
message: ``If you inflict injury on any Indian citizen in the
State of Jammu and Kashmir, or elsewhere, or commit any act of
violence or terrorism then the security forces have clear
instructions to act decisively and to defeat such intentions.''
Message to militants
Apart from rectifying the apprehensions among the security forces
that the ceasefire meant no level playing field, the Prime
Minister's statement is a ``message openly delivered'' to the
militants. This message, according to officials, is that there
would be no let-up in operations against the jehadi militants
while every effort would be made to spare the civilian population
of any collateral hardship. In a way, the statement merely
formalises the situation on the ground; and, as one official put
it, to the extent that it ``ends the duplicity'', the statement
betrays a self-assured approach.
Third, Mr. Vajpayee's statement reiterates the ``bilateral''
format of talks with Pakistan, thereby rejecting the APHC's
penchant for a ``tripartite'' approach as well as rules out a
mediatory role for any third party. However, this does mean a
willingness for simultaneous dialogues - with Pakistan and with
the APHC, though with separate agendas.
Against third parties
This point was further underlined by Mr. Brajesh Mishra, National
Security Adviser and Principal Secretary to the Prime Minister.
Speaking at a book-release function at the Jawaharlal Nehru
University, Mr. Mishra noted that ``though international opinion
is shifting in favour of India, (even) in the best of
circumstances a third party has its own agenda. The most
benevolent mediator could have his own interests which may not be
in line with our national interests.''
However, the officials concede that apart from the
unpredictability of Pakistan's response, there are many loose
ends - political and operational - that need to be sorted out
before the hope in the Prime Minister's statement could get
materialised.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Next : Bhat escapes bid on life | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|