|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, February 23, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
U.S. seeks explanation from Beijing
By Sridhar Krishnaswami
WASHINGTON, FEB. 22. The Bush administration is asking China to
explain the presence of its workers at Iraq's air defence
systems; but Washington has stopped short of accusing Beijing of
flouting the United Nations sanctions regime.
``We have raised with China our specific concerns about reports
of fibre optic cables and telecommunications projects in Iraq'',
said Mr. Richard Boucher, the State Department spokesman.
It has also been revealed that the Secretary of State, Gen. Colin
Powell, had raised the subject with the Chinese Ambassador, Mr.
Yang Jiechi, when he came to present his credentials. ``... We
are still awaiting a detailed response... The Secretary made that
point this morning to the Chinese Ambassador'', the spokesman
said.
The issue of Chinese workers - perhaps even military officials -
at Iraqi air defence sites has been raised before in much more
general terms. According to Mr. Boucher, the matter was raised by
the Assistant Secretary of State, Mr. David Welch, when he
visited Beijing in January. Unnamed senior officials of the Bush
administration have been saying that Chinese civilian and
military officials have been helping Iraq boost its capabilities
by using Chinese fibre optic cables.
In fact, officials here have been saying that the air attacks
over Iraq last Friday was timed to prevent casualties of Chinese
workers in the area. The argument is being made here that
American and British jets hit Iraqi targets knowing that Iraqi or
Chinese civilian workers will not be working on a Muslim holy
day. Washington is being careful not to repeat what happened in
Belgrade in 1999 when in the course of bombing targets in
Yugoslavia, the Chinese embassy was hit, resulting in casualties.
Meanwhile, the former United Nations Arms Inspector to Iraq, Mr.
Richard Butler, has said that the Security Council could be
seriously undermined if it was proved that China had provided
fibre optics to enhance Iraqi air defences. Mr. Butler has made
the argument that as a permanent member of the Security Council,
China would be undermining the Council's own decisions. ``It
would bring the Security Council into further disrepute. It would
make countries wonder about just exactly what motivated China
into behaving this way'', Mr. Butler was quoted as saying.
At a time when a lot of noise is being made on Chinese fibre
optics, there is also an ongoing debate as to how effective last
week's air raids against Iraq has been. While the Pentagon has
been maintaining that the attacks had achieved the purpose of
``disrupting and degrading'' Iraqi air defences, unnamed
officials say that the strikes had damaged fewer than half of the
targeted radars.
PTI reports from Beijing:
Beijing today angrily refuted Washington's allegation that its
personnel were helping Iraq in upgrading its air defence systems
by violating U.N.-imposed sanctions.
``We made our stance clear: that any effort to mislead the public
and divert public attention is out of ulterior motive and
futile,'' said the Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman, Mr. Zhu
Bangzao, in a statement. Iraq has also denied the U.S. charge.
Mr. Zhu said China had always carried out the resolution on Iraq
after it invaded Kuwait in 1990. ``The U.N. resolution on Iraq
should be carried out fully,'' he said maintaining that the
international community should fully respect the sovereignty and
territorial integrity of Iraq.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Sri Lankan tea estate workers seek wage hike Next : Taliban for compromise deal on Osama? | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|