|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, February 23, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Entertainment
| Previous
| Next
Difficult play well-enacted
When Stella Maris College opted for `Hazaar Chaurashir Ma' they
dared much. The students impressed one with a performance that
rose above the banalities of a college production, writes
ELIZABETH ROY.
TO AN average Stella Maris student today, the Naxalite movement
is almost a fabulation from Indian history of the 1960s and
1970s. But for those of us who were teenagers or adults during
those years, it is easy to relive the terror, confusion and the
resultant uncertainties the movement struck. It remained a
significant and inspiring event in this country for a number of
decades. In political parlance it might have become somewhat of
an anachronism, but all the factors that led to the movement
remain unchanged and they continue to cause other eruptions.
``Once I became a professional writer (and activist), I felt
increasingly that a writer should document her own time and
history,'' said Mahasweta Devi who wrote ``Hazaar Churashir Ma''
in 1974 as a novel in Bangla. (Samik Bandyopadhyay's translation
of the play is based on that.) In it she recreates this span of
history, except she deflects the focus on to an upper middle
class mother of the universal Naxalite, who is killed in an
``encounter''. In her own words her theme is ``an awakening of an
apolitical mother. Mothers bearing the brunt of social and
political oppression and enduring and resisting with indomitable
will''.
Sujata is called to the police station to identify the corpse of
her son Brati. She had never known nor can she understand that
part of her son's life. Her society and family sympathise - ``How
could Brati have done this?'' It takes her two years to piece
together a part of her son's life she had never known, to find a
moral rationale for his options and choices. She visits Somu's
(one of the four comrades/friends who were killed together)
house, a poor tenement where he found much happiness and a
surrogate mother who shared with him the freedom her poverty gave
her. Sujata meets Nandini, a fellow Naxalite who was in love with
Brati. The three women despite their social, economic and
ideological differences cope with the young man's loss. Mahasweta
Devi sets this reality against the hollow laughter and clinking
of glasses of alcohol at socialite evenings.
When Stella Maris College opted for ``Hazaar Churashir Ma''
(Mother of No. 1084), they dared much. Structurally it is not the
best of plays. The ``hazaar'' monologues and asides and short
scenes do not make for an easy production. A twenty-five strong
cast can only make it worse. However, in the typical Stella
Marian spirit and with backing from a generous and supportive
management, the students turned their four weeks of rehearsal
into a very successful play, which rose above the banalities of
the usual college production, thanks also to a very good director
in Sushma Ahuja.
Sushma's understanding and interpretation of the play were sound
and rooted in her years of experience in Hindi theatre and
television. With some basic rearrangement in the sequence of the
scenes and introduction of Bangla into the dialogue she made the
play extremely accessible and clarified contrasts by opening and
ending the play with a typical elitist Calcutta party scene.
Mithran Devanesan's set design totally contained Sushma's
understanding of the text. Devanesan divided the stage into three
sections that were also mutually inclusive. A crude picket fence
with a solid iron gate in the centre blocked off the upstage
half. Further upstage was a platform rising above the gate and
the barbed wire, signifying the police station, the prison,
generally a platform for police atrocities, violent mobs and
harsh hearts. The painted flag on top was lit in different hues
to evoke the different moods. Downstage left was the Chatterjee
home with two sparse chairs in black and red. In contrast,
downstage right, in sparse deal-wood was Somu's poor house where
Brati could come into his own. Grids in different designs
circumscribed the two households. A festive wall hanging dropped
down, curtaining off the prison whenever the party was on. The
sets opened up the Museum Theatre stage. Clever use of spots
highlighted monologues and the thoughts that were spoken aloud.
The audience would not have noticed any of this if the quality of
acting had fallen short in any way. Particularly impressive were
the mob scenes of violence and the inane social evenings. They
were very effectively caricatured.
The rest of the play was carried forward by the three strong
female roles - Sujatha (Sheetal Govindan), Somu's mother (Geetika
Chandrahasan) and Nandini (Pratyusha Gupta). Sheetal's portrayal
of the mother and the stirrings within her for a son were quite
incredible. Pratyusha as the new generation, intellectual
revolutionary, who manages to keep her emotions under control,
was very impressive. Geetika put in a strong performance as
Somu's mother and contrasted beautifully against both Sujata and
Nandini. Some of the male roles well enacted were Somu (Remya
Abraham) and Police Officer Saroj Pal (Aparna Ram). Incidentally
this production gave me no opportunity to record yet again my
usual complaint about women in male outfits. P. C. Ramakrishna
who was at the play said to me, ``It was an excellent show. For
the first time the girls in male costumes did not distract me at
all''.
However, I do have two quarrels with the production. Sushma had a
different Nandini (Natasha Jamal) and Sujatha (Anjali
Ramachandran) for the second night. A bunch of amateur students
fighting the constraints of time and experience are not ready for
such professional experiments. It meant the lead roles got less
of an opportunity to test new waters and refine their act, it put
double the burden on the rest of the cast and the audience
weren't sure they got the best deal. Curiosity had me at the
Museum Theatre taking in both the shows. I must admit the
performances were unequal.
The other quarrel I have is that Stella Maris opened the
performance only to their friends and family and as a result
denied the general theatre going public an opportunity to enjoy a
difficult play very well done by a bunch of gutsy young women who
will hopefully shape future direction.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Entertainment Previous : Abhinaya in right ambience Next : Colourful feature | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|