|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, March 06, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Features
| Previous
| Next
State and identity
NATION AND NATIONAL IDENTITY IN SOUTH ASIA: S. L. Sharma and T.
K. Oommen; Orient Longman Ltd., 1/24, Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi-
110020. Rs. 300.
THE PAKISTANI political leader Abdul Wali Khan (son of Khan Abdul
Ghaffar Khan) was asked few years ago by a journalist, ``Are you
a Pakistani, a Muslim or a Pathan?'' Wali Khan replied that he
combined all the three characteristics. The journalist persisted
and asked Wali Khan what was his primary identity. He responded,
``I am a Pakistani for 30 years, a Muslim for 1400 years and a
Pathan for 5000 years.''
The multiple identity of South Asians, an intrinsic feature of
the socio-political profile of the region, has made the task of
nation building in South Asia a fascinating and exciting
exercise. The book under review is a reproduction of some good
papers originally published in the Sociological Bullet under the
theme ``Nation and national identity in South Asia''.
The authors seek to ``conceptualise the experience of nation
formation and deformation in South Asia'' with reference to
India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka.
The book would have been further enriched if the authors had also
included other countries in South Asia, namely Nepal, Bhutan and
Maldives.
Political scientists unfortunately use the term nation and state
as synonymous and this semantic confusion has done incalculable
harm for understanding the politics of developing countries. A
survey of the world's 132 states in 1971 found that only 12 (9
per cent) could justifiably be classified as ``nation-states'' in
the sense of the boundaries of the ``territorial-juridical
identity being co-terminus or approximately co-terminus with the
distribution of a particular national group.''
The statement made by Massimo d'Azeglu, with special reference to
Italy after unification holds true of most states, which came
into existence after the Second World War. ``We have made Italy,
now we must make Italians.''
The rise of ethno-nationalism and intensification of ethnic
conflicts in different parts of the world raises an interesting
theoretical question, which many Marxian social scientists have
so far not only ignored, but also considered as taboo. They
subscribed to the view that the processes of industrialisation
and modernisation would dissolve ethnic identities and create new
identities based on class formations.
Recent developments belie this claim. The political assertion of
various nationalities in the Soviet Union, the revolutionary
changes which have taken place in Eastern Europe and Central
Europe, the demands of the Blacks in the U.S., the Irish conflict
in the U.K., the developments in Fiji, problems facing the ethnic
Chinese in South-East Asian countries - all these are not only
illustrations of the pervasiveness of ethnicity, but also
underline the possibilities of the exacerbation of ethnic
conflicts in the years to come.
However, it is necessary to keep one important point in mind.
Whether harmony or conflict governs inter-ethnic relationships in
multi-cultural societies hinges, to a large extent, upon whether
the political system provides for tolerance of each other's
beliefs and value systems. In those countries where the dominant
political theme is ``ethnicisation of politics'' or
``politicisation of ethnic communities'' the chances of
escalation of ethnic conflicts are more.
Prof. T. K. Oommen sums up succinctly. He underlines the
necessity to distinguish between citizenship and nationality.
Citizenship alludes to membership in a politico-legal identity,
namely the state and the rights and responsibilities flowing from
it.
Nation refers to a cultural identity. All countries in South
Asia, except Maldives, are a plurality of nations. Our goal must
be the harmonious co-existence of a plurality of nations within a
democratic federal state.
And if the problem is tackled with sympathy and understanding, a
nation ``need not aspire for a state of its own.'' This is the
primary challenge for the leaders of South Asia.
V. SURYANARAYAN
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Features Previous : Rolls Royce Guru Next : Time, the leveller | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|