|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, March 06, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Features
| Previous
| Next
Mathematics of an ancient era
VEDIC MATHEMATICS - VEDA GANITHAM Part I: S. Haridas; Bharatiya
Vidya Bhavan, Kulapathi K.M. Munshi Marg, Mumbai-400007. Rs. 190.
IT AUGURS well that more books on Vedic mathematics are being
published nowadays, as it would promote wider dissemination and
critical appraisal for its incorporation in school mathematics
curriculum.
The author of the book under review is a working mathematics
teacher in a government higher secondary school in Kerala. He is
a great scholar in Sanskrit.
While covering some of the contributions of Jagadguru Sri Bharati
Krishna Thirthaji in part I, he has included some extra materials
- arithmetic in chapter II, geometry in chapter V and
trigonometry in chapter VI with Sanskrit equivalents of
mathematical vocabulary employed, without mention of sutras.
The book seems to be written and brought out rather hurriedly as
could be seen by the errors of spelling and punctuation: for
instance, many of the interrogative sentences do not carry
question mark at the end. Instead of mentioning ``tens place'',
``tenth place'' is used. The figure on page 137 should be a
rectangle as intended, but it has turned out to be a
parallelogram and the sectors of the circle change in size while
being shown rearranged to form a parallelogram. The
perpendiculars to the diagonal on page 141 have not come out
properly. Coming to the exposition, there are some omissions and
commissions which can be taken care of in the next edition. Only
a few are cited.
On page 19, the identity (x+a) (x+b) = x2 + (a+b)x + ab is given
as is usually taught in schools and not as x(x+a+b)+ab as is
presented by Jagadguru himself in his book on page 19. While
dealing with per cents (pp 85 to 89), is it not incorrect to
multiply by 100 and give the answer with percentage sign? e.g.
1/5 = 1/5 x 100 = 20%. While converting simple fractions like
1/19 into recurring decimal fractions, it is not indicated how to
decide when to stop to complete the recurring part of
complementation or Wikhilam Sutra.
The book is written in textbook format with reverence and
fervour.
P. K. SRINIVASAN
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Features Previous : Tamil cultural heritage Next : Glorious creative past | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|