|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, March 10, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Previous
| Next
Not the right thing to do
Sir, - I disagree with Mr. Rajinder Sachar when he says it will
not be beneficial to the Government to sell its stake in Balco. I
think both Sterlite Industries and, more importantly, the
Government will benefit from the deal.
Balco's evaluation was done by a reputed U.S. firm called Jardine
Fleming, in a four-month-long evaluation exercise. The price was
determined by the Discounted Cash Flow method where the expected
future earnings are discounted at a fixed rate to arrive at the
present value. Jardine Fleming evaluated the 51 per cent shares
of Balco to be Rs. 551.6 crores (Rs. 412.5 crores plus 25 per
cent as control premium). This evaluation was transparent and
fair enough.
The Chief Minister, Mr. Ajit Jogi,and his allies say that Balco
is worth far more than the Rs. 1,082 crores, as the replacement
cost of the 270 MW power plant itself is more than Rs. 1,500
crores. In reality, if the Government tries to sell Balco at its
asset price, there would be no buyers at that range - a major
player of the aluminium industry, Hindalco offered only Rs. 275
crores for Balco.
With Balco's decreasing profits (from Rs. 79.84 crores in 1997-
98 to Rs. 55.8 crores) and a mere Rs. 18 crores as dividend, it
may soon be in the red. Other companies like Hindalco and Nalco
are beginning to expand their capacities and Balco will be left
behind for two reasons. One, for the simple reason that it has no
money to investand two, because investing will be in direct
contrast to the Government's idea to disinvest.
Manoj Mathan,
Coonoor
Sir, - The article by Rajinder Sachar places things in the right
perspective. The ruckus created by the Congress(I) is a classic
example of doublespeak. But it has to be appreciated that a
company in a core sector like aluminum, employing 7000 and having
a market share of 15 per cent has been handed over to a private
player in a clandestine fashion.
There were only two bidders, one of whom quoted a price far below
the reserve price of Rs. 551 crores (a very low price considering
that the company has reserves and surplus of Rs. 460 crores and
assets worth Rs. 1000 to 2000 crores including captive power
plants generating over 250 MW). This is anything but competitive
bidding as envisaged by `the Disinvestment Commission'. After the
takeover of Balco, Sterlite Industries will hold a market shareof
about 20 per cent which amounts to holding a monopoly under
the MRTP Act. As pointed out by the author, even capitalist
countries like the U.S., the U.K. and other European Union
members do not allow this type of monopolies as it is against the
principle of free competition.
Besides, it is violative of the provisions of Constitution which
prohibit the transfer of land in a scheduled tribal area to non-
tribals. The State of Chhatisgarh is well within its rights to
cancel the lease.
Sunil Arora,
New Delhi
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Previous : Politicising the deal Next : Disappointing budget | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|