|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, March 11, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Sport
| Previous
| Next
Manan Chandra triumphs
By Our Sports Reporter
BANGALORE, MARCH 10. Delhi's Manan Chandra capped his
irresistible run in the inaugural National Pool championship with
a superb title triumph. Manan besides bagging the winner's
trophy, was richer by Rs. 15,000.
At the KSBA Hall here today, the 20-year-old Manan Chandra dished
out a Houdini act in the semifinals against K. Ranjan of Tamil
Nadu at 10-7 before pulling the rug off Mukesh Rehani in an all
Delhi final. Manan won 11-9. Rehani had to content with Rs.
10,000.
Manan with a clean slate in the league phase looked a winner. And
when Sunil Sharma of Karnataka was swept aside in the round of
32, many enthusiasts would have pitch forked on the talents of
the junior National snooker champion from Delhi. Manan did not
disappoint.
Manan, true to pool standards, is an aggressive bet. And when his
potting and positioning stands him good there is no better
exponent of the craft.
``There is pool culture in Delhi and we have grown from that,''
said the unassuming Manan. A former semi-finalist in the World
under-21 snooker championship, Manan was the odds on favourite.
The 39-year-old Mukesh Rehani a billiards exponent, with a World
ranking of 21, did well against Md. Asim of West Bengal in the
semifinals. But the senior pro, in an attempt to unsettle the
youngster did try once too much and came a cropper.
Level at 4-4, Manan Chandra was virtually gifted with the ninth
`rack' as Rehani failed with the combination. But Rehani was
quick to hit back (5-5). Rehani however fouled to give Manan the
advantage yet again at 6-5. But Manan fouled with the cue ball to
spurt the advantage.
Manan with a start to finish effort wrapped the 13th rack and
again gave nothing to chance in tie next to go 8-6 up. But Mukesh
was not finished. A splendid clearing, bringing all his billiards
experience to the fore, Rehani did bridge the deficit down twice
but that was as far as Rehani could get.
Manan came back strongly for a start to finish clearance to go
10-9 up and then came off with a incredible combination, which
clicked to leave Mukesh `rooted' to his place. Manan remained
unbeaten in the championship for a 11-9 verdict.
For the third place, Mohd. Asim of West Bengal ended the run of
K. Ranjan with a 8-4 margin.
K. Ranjan, the Tamil Nadu ace looked like ending Manan's run in
the semifinals. A 3-0 lead looked adequate the way Ranjan started
off. But Manan was not finished. The Delhi youngster had other
ideas as he pulled off four racks on the trot to go 5-4 up after
being 1-4 down.
Ranjan at this stage tended to lapse in concentration which Manan
was quick to capitalise on. A missed `combination' which won a
sigh from the goodly spectator response by Ranjan did enable
Manan go 9-7 up, which otherwise would have been 8-8 all. And
this had the final say on the bearing of the match, as Manan left
nothing to chance thereafter to win handsomely at 10-7.
Mukesh too won his semifinals against Md. Asim quite comfortably,
winning 10-5, after being tied 3-3 at one stage.
Asim and Ranjan were presented with Rs. 5000 each for their
efforts.
The results: Final (Best of 21 racks): Manan Chandra (Del) bt
Mukesh Rehani (Del) 11-9. For third place (best of 15 racks): Md.
Asim (WB) bt K. Ranjan (TN) 8-4. Semifinals (best of 19 racks):
Manan Chandra bt K.Ranjan 10-7; Mukesh Rehani bt Md. Asim 10-5.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Sport Previous : Gopi Chand on threshold of glory Next : Optimism takes a backseat as Indians take on the cruising Aussies | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|