|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, March 11, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Features
| Previous
| Next
A matter of sitting space
THESE days, whenever I commute to Mumbai city from suburban
Bandra, I cast a longing look at the crowded first class coaches
before pushing my way into the absolutely packed second class
coaches of the suburban trains. Since the time I quit a regular
job in 1990, I have not travelled by first class in these trains.
For nearly 13 years prior to 1990, I was a regular commuter on
the suburban trains and noted some essential factors. The seats
in the first class coaches accommodated three passengers, whereas
the number was four in the second class. Mind you, the seats were
of the same size but the first class passengers enjoyed the
privilege of being three-on-a-seat facility. The seats were also
cushioned.
I don't think the Railways had laid down any rules on this issue.
A second class commuter, whenever he eyed three passengers on a
seat, would move in and claim the fourth place as his right. A
regular first class passenger would hesitate to do that.
Occasionally, some new comer would push his way and become the
fourth passenger on the seat. He would not be thrown out but the
other three passengers would look up, sigh, nod to each other and
shrug their shoulders. The message was clear, "O how do we tackle
these boors who violate the unwritten convention of first class
travel?"
Let me admit, the average seat could accommodate four passengers.
Particularly if they were thin. The problem arose if one
passenger was fat and then all the four had to suffer. And if two
passengers were above the average weight, you had it! If you were
seated in a corner, you would find yourself slowly pushed out and
you can't do anything, except try pushing back. This would not
work if you weighed 60 kilograms and the passenger seated next to
you, a cool 90 kilos. The battle was lost even before it began!
A couple of months back, while returning from Pune, I and my
wife, travelled by the legendary Deccan Queen second class chair
car. I had travelled on this train several years before and
remembered the journey to be very pleasant and comfortable. But
things had changed over the years. The second class coaches were
provided with seats which were meant to accommodate two people,
but had to put up with three. My wife and I had seats facing each
other. The two passengers on our seats were comfortably stout and
this created problems for us. Soon I found myself slowly being
pushed out as my co-passengers made themselves comfortable. My
wife, being small- built had fewer problems, but I found I had
space enough only for one buttock. It was with great difficulty
that I finished the four hour journey without being pushed to the
floor of the train. Once we got down, I was bothered by a sore
backside for three days and resolved not to travel second class
by the Deccan Queen any more.
This made me think about a vital issue: how much sitting space
does a person need while travelling? Since modes of transport,
including airlines, are solely concerned with carrying more and
more people, passenger comfort is the last on their priority
list. Some years back, the famous American humourist Art Buchwald
wrote a very funny piece on how airlines in the U.S. reduced
sitting space, leg and elbow room to the size of the toilets so
that more passengers could be accommodated. It was as though
passengers were strapped to their seats as in a space vehicle.
But I wish the Mumbai suburban railway authorities pay some
attention to this vital question, three commuters or four per
seat! I don't mind being among the four squeezed on a seat
provided the other three were thin. We could just manage and not
suffer too much. Perhaps, the railways could divide the commuters
into "Normal" and "Heavy" categories and the seats could
accommodate three "heavies" and four "normals". The "heavy"
categories could be decided by their weight and backside
measurements.
I had always found the heavies less sensitive towards their
fellow commuters. They want to be seated somehow or the other and
would not hesitate to barge in and claim a seat in the company of
three other heavies. Now, four heavies on a seat is , well, a
sight to behold! You expect at least one or two of them to tumble
out of their seats and come crashing down. But so far this has
not happened in my commuting career.
However, I do not expect any reforms from the Indian Railways to
help the suburban commuters in the days to come. Our dear
Mamtadidi is more concerned with running more trains through her
beloved state of West Bengal. The Mumbai commuters mean nothing
to her. So we have to carry on, squeezed in between the heavies
and suffering sore backsides!
V.GANGADHAR
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Features Previous : Patterns of India's mosaic Next : The nitrogen fix | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|