|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, March 14, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Fijian Chiefs keep decision under wraps
By Amit Baruah
SUVA (FIJI), MARCH 13. A ``decision'' was made by Fiji's Great
Council of Chiefs (GCC) today on the merits of the March 1 Court
of Appeal judgment restoring democratic rule in the country, but
it wasn't made public.
After sitting for nearly eight hours, the GCC meeting
``concluded'' with a resolve to brief the President, Mr. Josefa
Iloilo, on the results of the meeting, seen as crucial to resolve
the current constitutional impasse in the country.
While it appears that Mr. Iloilo will continue as President, the
GCC, by keeping its decision to itself, has continued the
unending suspense in the country. Speculation abounds, but the
constitutional future must be spelt out through an official
announcement by the President now.
Finally, it was expected after inconclusive deliberations over
two days last week, the GCC would announce its view of the
current situation in the country, with specific reference to the
Court of Appeal verdict, but failed to do so. According to
official sources, a delegation of Chiefs is likely to drive to
Lautoka, on the western part of Viti Levu island, to brief the
President on the conclusions reached by the Chiefs. After this,
Mr. Iloilo is likely to announce his own decisions. How long such
a process will take is anybody's guess.
An official spokesman announced after the GCC meeting to waiting
presspersons that they were unable to hold a press conference as
was announced beforehand, ``because it was part of Fijian
protocol for the information first of all be conveyed to His
Excellency, the President''.
Separately, the ousted Prime Minister, Mr. Mahendra Chaudhry,
told The Hindu today that he expected general elections in the
country in the middle or end of August this year. The GCC, he
said, would advise the President on the kind of interim
arrangements for governance required till August. Mr. Chaudhry
favoured the setting up of a small caretaker Government which
could have representatives of all parties - nominated by the
parties themselves.
He stated that going against the decision of the Court of Appeal
would invite a backlash from the international community while
the people in Fiji would have to continue their struggle to
restore democracy in the country.
Mr. Chaudhry, who has been under fire from sections within his
own party, said he had no intention of resigning to make way for
the election of his deputy, Dr. Tupeni Baba, an ethnic Fijian
whose name is being mentioned for the job of Prime Minister. ``I
will not bend to racism of any kind. If I step aside or resign, I
would be conceding to their (the racists') demands,'' Mr.
Chaudhry maintained. ``It will mean compromising the rights of
Indians in the future (to hold the post of Prime Minister. I have
no such mandate,'' he declared emphatically.
As far as Dr. Baba himself was concerned, Mr. Chaudhry said his
ambition had got the better of him. Asked about statements
regarding his style of leadership, Mr. Chaudhry rejected the
criticism, which has come from both the Fijian community and some
sections of the Indo-Fijians as well.
The ousted Prime Minister said he did not agree with descriptions
that he was ``arrogant and insensitive''. Leaders who stood their
ground were called unbending and insensitive, he said. Many times
he had asked for concrete examples of his ``arrogance'', but none
had been provided, he said.
Some among Mr. Chaudhry's critics have gone as far as to say that
he was the ``wrong Prime Minister for the right Constitution''.
A report in a recent issue of The Review magazine published here
had this to say: ``Chaudhry traits such as his rigidness,
arrogance and bravery propelled him to the top as a trade
unionist and politician only to bring him down as the leader of a
nation... snubbing coalition allies... moving too fast on land
issues, getting into a fight with the media... proved damaging,
as did appointing his son his private secretary...''
However, there are those who have no quarrel with Mr. Chaudhry's
uprightness and hardworking tendencies, only with his
``insensitivity'' to the conditions in the country, including his
approach to the ethnic Fijian community.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Buddhist protest march in Colombo Next : Russia pulls out some troops from Chechnya | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|