|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, March 14, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
Govt. denies irregularities in Konaseema power project deal
By Our Special Correspondent
HYDERABAD, MARCH 13. The State Government here on Tuesday refuted
the allegations of violations of bidding norms in awarding the
450 MW gas-based power project to Konaseema EPS Oakwell Power
Limited.
Addressing a press conference Mr.K. Subbarayudu, Minister for
Energy, and the Energy Secretary to the Government, Mr.V.S.
Sampath, said the two companies joined together and were
permitted to develop a single project with 359 MW with natural
gas as fuel.
The reasons for the merger were: the barge-mounted EPS Oakwell
Power Limited did not have fuel allocation for the PPA period of
15 years (it had fuel allocation for only seven years) and the
Konaseema Power Project, on the other hand had gas allocation but
did not have a sanctioned power project.
The two companies had agreed to come together and adopted the
lowest tariff of 94 paise as levellised fixed charge and 98 paise
at current exchange rates and were permitted to proceed with
implementation of a combined project.
As the original company retained the 11 per cent equity as
required and went in for a new partner, as per the conditions
there was nothing wrong in awarding the project to the new one,
he clarified.
The Minister said the EPS Oakwell Power Limited which was awarded
project through international competitive bidding route (ICB) but
did not have fuel allocation for the PPA period of 15 years, made
proposal to induct M/s. Konaseema Power Corporation Limited which
had gas linkage and requested for permission to convert into
land-based project with the name M/s Konaseema EPS Oakwell Power
Limited.
M/s EPS Oakwell Power Limited was awarded a project on ICB and it
was they who inducted the other into their combined strength and
sought enhancement of capacity to 358.9 MW to enable them to
match the lowest tariff obtained in the ICB. The Minister was of
the view that the project was an ICB project. The Minister
maintained that it was so because the original promoter was
selected through ICB and the lowest tariff obtained in the ICB
was maintained.
The capacity was increased because they had the wherewithal and
were ready to give power at 1.75 per unit. Any company coming
forward for this would be given the same treatment, he said.
The Minister said that the Congress which had earlier discussed
the issue in detail in the Assembly was repeatedly resorting to a
smear campaign to tarnish the image of TD. The ruling party was
aiming to achieve surplus power at lowest cost in the country.
Earlier, Dr.Y.S. Rajasekhara Reddy, Leader of the Opposition,
alleged irregularities in the allocation of the project and
referred to a query from the Ministry of Power seeking
confirmation as to whether the projects earlier being developed
independently by the two companies were no longer being pursued
and instead a single project was proposed to be developed by
them.
The letter also sought clarification on the mode of award of the
358.9 MW power project to the joint venture company if it were a
new company. It also sought to know whether the awarding of the
project did not amount of violation of the guidelines making ICB
mandatory.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : MLAs in a confessional mood Next : Walk out over Home Minister 'silence' | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|