|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, March 15, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Business
| Previous
| Next
Where is the space for all the vehicles?
IT IS not just the pollution they cause or the heavy foreign
exchange outgo on providing fuel to them that should make one
think twice about continuing with automobiles as a means of
personal transport in India. There is another scarce resource in
the country that is being rapidly gobbled up by the automobile -
land in urban areas.
If you think this is an exaggeration, just ask the residents of
Greater Kailash or any of the other New Delhi residential areas.
Over the years, particularly since the advent of Maruti,
automobiles have usurped all the space in these colonies not
occupied by houses, so much so that a pedestrian has to almost
walk over the parked cars to reach anywhere.
Thanks to the space-devouring nature of the automobile, roads in
Indian cities such as Jaipur, Bangalore, Pune, Hyderabad,
Lucknow, Kanpur, Coimbatore, Kochi are for most of the day
clogged with barely moving traffic. This leads to such ironies
that often, it is quicker to go from place to place in the city
centre on a bike rather than in a car. One may recall that, back
in the Sixties in Bangalore, it took just 25 minutes to bike from
Malleswaram to Brigade Road. Today, by car, it takes 45 minutes,
if you are lucky there is no traffic jam on the way.
Urban phenomenon
None of the Indian cities was designed to accommodate dense
automobile traffic. In almost all of them, barring perhaps New
Delhi, Chandigarh and Bhuvaneshwar, the road surface area is less
than 5 per cent of the total city area.
This was tolerable 30 years ago when the addition of new cars to
Indian city roads was around 50,000 per annum and of
scooters/motorcycles around one lakh per annum. Today the Indian
automobile industry churns out nearly six lakh four-wheelers and
4.2 million two-wheelers annually. The road space remains almost
the same, but for some peripheral chopping off of pavement space
which only brings the pedestrians out onto the road and further
constricts the road space. Traffic gridlock is going to beecome
more frequent in the days to come.
Parking problems
There is another painful dimension to the space problem with
regard to the automobile - the need for parking. It has become
almost impossible in the big cities to provide parking space in
downtown business areas. Most roads are so narrow that using the
kerbside for parking only creates bottlenecks for the flow of
traffic. The problem is further exacerbated with the proclivity
of Indian car drivers to double park.
Diverting the parking to side roads in residential areas only
leads to strife when haphazardly parked cars block the entrances
of houses. There is glib talk of promoting multi-storey car parks
like in the US. What is forgotten is that building such
facilities is expensive and the resultant parking fees to break
even will be anywhere between Rs. 30 and Rs. 50 per hour. When
the average car owner balks at paying even the Rs. 5 per hour now
charged for kerbside parking, why will he use the much costlier
multistorey car parks?
Offices in Indian cities are already feeling the pinch of the
automobile explosion. Take the case of The Hindu office in
Bangalore, which has compound space. In the early Seventies, only
two cars and a few scooters had to be accomodated in the
compound. There was space left over for a volleyball court for
the off-duty entertainment of the staff.
Today, the car population has gone up to two dozen and the two-
wheelers to over 50. Forget about a volleyball court, there is
not enough space for the vehicles and everyday parking inside is
a game of musical chairs. If this is the plight of an office with
compound space, imagine the situation of offices housed in multi-
storey complexes downtown.
In a recent essay, Mr. Lester Brown, former chief of the
Washington D.C.-based Worldwatch Institute, describes graphically
the space gobbling propensity of the automobile in industrialised
societies.
Each U.S. car, for example, requires an average 0.07 hectare of
paved land for roads and parking space. With its 214 million
motor vehicles, the area devoted to roads and parking lots covers
an estimated 16 million hectares (approximately 1.5 lakh sq.
kilometres ) in the U.S. Just to get things into focus the total
land area of India is about 33 lakh sq. km. of which flat land is
about two-thirds.
More often than not, cropland is paved simply because the flat,
well-drained soils that are well suited for farming are also
ideal for building roads. Once paved, land is not easily
reclaimed. As environmentalist Mr. Rupert Cutler once noted,
``Asphalt is the land's last crop.''
Car-centred industrial societies that are densely populated, such
as Germany, the U.K. and Japan, have paved an average of 0.02
hectare per vehicle. And they have lost some of their most
productive cropland in the process.
More acute in developing world
With automobile ownership reaching near saturation in the
industrialised countries, the global automobile majors are
turning their focus on the developing countries, where automobile
fleets are still small. More and more of the 11 million cars
added annually to the world's vehicle fleet of 520 million are
found in the developing world. This means that the war between
cars and crops is being waged over wheat fields and rice paddies
in countries where hunger is common. The outcome of this conflict
in China and India, two countries that together have 38 per cent
of the world's population, will affect food security everywhere.
If China were one day to achieve the Japanese automobile
ownership rate of one car for every two people, it would have a
fleet of 640 million, compared with only 13 million today. While
the prospect of such an enormous fleet may seem farfetched, we
need only remind ourselves that China has already overtaken the
U.S. in steel production, fertilizer use, and red meat
production. It is a huge economy and since 1980 also the world's
fastest growing economy. In 1994 Beijing announced that it
planned to make the auto industry one of the growth sectors for
the next few decades.
But growth at what cost? Assuming a requirement of 0.02 hectares
of paved land per vehicle in China, as in Europe and Japan, a
fleet of 640 million cars would require paving nearly 13 million
hectares of land, most of which would likely be cropland. This
figure is over one half of China's 23 million hectares of rice
land. Even one car for every four people, half the Japanese
ownership rate, will consume a substantial area of cropland.
While India is geographically only a third the size of China, it
too has more than one billion people, and it now has eight
million motor vehicles. Its fast-growing villages and cities are
already encroaching on its cropland. Add to this the land paved
for the automobile, and India, too, will be facing a heavy loss
of cropland. A country projected to add 515 million more people
by 2050 cannot afford to cover valuable cropland with asphalt for
roads and parking lots.
The plain fact is that there is not enough land in China, India,
and other densely populated countries such as Indonesia,
Bangladesh, Pakistan, Iran, Egypt, and Mexico to support
automobile-centred transportation systems.
Looming urban chaos
Governments that subsidise an automobile infrastructure with
revenues collected from the entire population are, in effect,
collecting money from the poor to support the whims of the
wealthy. In subsidising the development of an auto-centred
transport system, governments are also inevitably subsidising the
paving of cropland that can lead to a food crisis in the future.
In the land-hungry developing world, the time has come to
reassess the future of the automobile, to design transportation
systems that provide mobility for entire populations, not just
affluent minorities, and that do this without threatening food
security.
The emphasis should shift to buses and trains for mass transport
and the bicycle for individual transport. This is not a Luddite
prescription. On the contrary, it is a futuristic solution and
the only one that can prevent urban chaos and food shortages in
countries such as India and China.
N. N. Sachitanand
in Bangalore
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Business Previous : Basics of a car Next : VRS can be an opportunity | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|