|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, March 18, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Previous
| Next
Tehelka expose: Probe by sitting judge unlikely
By Harish Khare
NEW DELHI, MARCH 17. The Chief Justice of India, Mr. A.S. Anand,
is believed to have turned down the Government's request that a
sitting judge of the Supreme Court be spared for conducting an
inquiry into the Tehelka expose. The Prime Minister, Mr. Atal
Behari Vajpayee, had announced the Union Cabinet's decision to
hold a judicial probe in a national broadcast on Friday.
Though Union Law Ministry sources said a formal request (for a
sitting judge) had been sent today, it is learnt that Mr. Justice
Anand was sounded on Friday evening before the Cabinet met. He is
believed to have firmly told the governmental interlocutor that
it would be difficult to spare a sitting judge; hence, the caveat
in the Prime Minister's broadcast of a ``sitting or retired''
judge.
The probe will, in all probability, be undertaken by a retired
judge. The Government is not obliged to consult the Chief Justice
in the choice of a judge in case a retired judge has to conduct a
probe.
The Chief Justice's reluctance is being explained as part of a
well-formed belief that the apex court should stay away from
probing politically-sensitive cases under the Commission of
Inquiry Act, 1952. The judicial fraternity was unhappy with the
controversy that followed when it spared a sitting judge, Mr.
Justice Wadhawa, to probe the burning of Graham Staines and his
two sons in Orissa.
In the case of the Tehelka probe, the reluctance is even more
pronounced. It is evident that the Government expects the inquiry
judge to clear the name and restore the honour of the former
Defence Minister, Mr. George Fernandes. No sitting judge of the
Supreme Court is likely to accept the brief.
In the recent past, probes by sitting judges - like Mr. Justice
Verma (lapses in Rajiv Gandhi's security), Mr. Justice M.P.
Thakker (Indira Gandhi assassination), Mr. Justice Ranganath
Misra (the 1984 anti-Sikh riots) - yielded a rich crop of
political controversies.
Political bickerings apart, there is a feeling that the apex
court was already burdened with a heavy case load, and sparing a
sitting judge would not help matters. After the tragic railway
accident in Punjab in December last, the (then) Railway Minister,
Ms. Mamata Banerjee, had announced in Parliament that a sitting
judge would probe the mishap; she made the announcement without
consulting the Chief Justice of India, and later had to be
satisfied with a retired judge.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Previous : Sonia asks Vajpayee to quit Next : Samata Ministers may relent | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|