|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, March 19, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Previous
| Next
Were Russian shells good enough?
By Atul Aneja
NEW DELHI, MARCH 18. The reference to the Rs. 150-crore Krasnopol
artillery shells contract in the Tehelka tapes has indicated that
the deal was not about corruption alone; the quality of the
shells may also have been compromised on.
If true, this would be unprecedented as even in the Bofors
scandal the quality of the gun was never questioned. In fact, the
155 mm Bofors howitzer proved its merit adequately during the
Kargil war. The Krasnopol is a Russian laser-guided high accuracy
shell, meant for the Bofors howitzer. According to its
manufacturers, it can be used for tearing apart armoured attacks
and also destroying bunkers, even in high-altitude areas.
According to the Tehelka tapes, the shells failed in the trials,
but were still pushed into service. A middleman, Maj. S.J. Singh
(retd.) played a key role in this. Major Singh claimed in the
``expose'' that they failed in five out of six tests, and yet the
procurement of 5,000 shells was allegedly pushed through.
Highly-placed Government sources said the trials were first
carried out in the Rajasthan deserts in 1997. According to Mr.
Arkady Shipunov, a member of the Russian Academy of Sciences and
who published an article in the Russian Defence Trade Journal,
three shells were successfully fired in June 1999 in the
Rajasthan deserts. In other words, the performance of the shells
in the plains has not been particularly questioned.
Problems arose during the high-altitude tests. In March 1999, two
shells were unsuccessfully fired in the Kargil highland ranges,
Mr. Shipunov said. Government sources added that two shells were
also fired during the Kargil war without any significant
improvement in results.
Nevertheless, India signed a contract in June 1999, but on the
condition that the agreement would come into effect only after
the shells underwent comprehensive tests at heights up to 4,500
m, Mr. Shipunov said. In other words, this procurement, though
finalised, was linked to the success of the high-altitude tests.
The Russian side decided to carry out more tests after making the
required changes in the shells, as well as the firing tables. It
claimed that the shell propellant was changed. Instead of the
NATO standard fuel, a Russian propellant was used.
The tests were carried out in Jammu and Kashmir in September-
October 1999 in the presence of representatives of the Army's
Weapon and Equipment Directorate. Targets were apparently
positioned at various distances between 2.5 and 7 km and at
elevations of 500 to 1,000 m above the gun positions.
The Russian side claimed that the revised tests were successful.
However, a section of the Defence Ministry rejected this view.
Nevertheless, the consignment of Krasnopol shells arrived from
Russia. But they have not yet been handed over to troops in high-
altitude areas, the sources said. Besides, the Russian side had
not delivered the training simulators, which are indispensable as
firing of live shells during training is prohibitively expensive.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Previous : Sonia calls for 'all-out war' Next : BJP has become 'Congressised': RSS | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|