|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, March 20, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Other States
| Previous
| Next
'CBI can register graft case'
By Nirnimesh Kumar
NEW DELHI, MARCH 19.
Criminal lawyers here are of the view that it is within the ambit
of the Central Bureau of Investigation to register a corruption
case in the Tehelka.com expose on the role of middlemen and
bribery in defence deals.
An offence of indulging in corrupt practices by public servants
has been committed when officials were alleged to have accepted
money other than legal remuneration from the .com reporters.
The Supreme Court says that the moment an investigating agency
comes to know about the commission of an offence, it is mandatory
for them to immediately reduce it to writing and initiate
investigation, says Mr. K.C. Chorpa, a criminal lawyer quoting a
judgment of the Apex court.
Registration of an FIR does not mean pronouncing someone as
accused as the investigating agency could register a case and
start investigation into the allegations without mentioning
anybody as accused, Mr. Chopra says.
The CBI can register a corruption case under Sections 12 and 13
against public servants and Section 8 and 9 against private
persons under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for their
alleged acceptance of bribe promising to help fix deals, Mr. S.S.
Sindhi, a lawyer of the Patiala House courts says.
Quoting a Supreme Court ruling of 1992 where it was upheld that
``once the amount is found in the possession of the accused, the
burden shifts on him to explain the circumstances to prove his
innocence as contemplated under Section 20 of the Act,'' Mr.
Sindhi adds.
Section 20 of the Act also helps the CBI to register a case in
the allegations. The Section says: ``......... if it is proved
that an accused person has accepted or obtained or has agreed to
accept or attempted to obtain for himself, or for any other
person, any gratification (other than legal remuneration) or any
valuable thing from any person, it shall be presumed, unless the
contrary is proved, that he accepted or obtained or agreed to
accept or attempted to obtain that gratification or that valuable
thing, as the case may be, as a motive or reward...........
without consideration or for a consideration which he knows to be
inadequate.''
In a cognisable offence like this, there was no need for a
complainant to formally lodge a complaint; the CBI can on their
own suo motu register a case, says Pandit R.K. Naseem, a Delhi
High court lawyer.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Other States Previous : A date with computer, mouse and all that Next : CM appears at court hearing | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|