|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, March 23, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Next
Bid to divert attention: Cong.
By Our Special Correspondent
NEW DELHI, MARCH 22. The Congress today continued its defence of
Mr. Vincent George, private secretary to the party president, Ms.
Sonia Gandhi, and questioned the timing of the CBI First
Information Report. ``The idea behind the move to file a first
information report is to divert attention from the Tehelka
expose,'' said the party spokesperson, Mr. S. Jaipal Reddy.
The Congress termed the move a ``vendetta'', emphasising on the
timing of the CBI action, coming as it did in the midst of the
Tehelka expose. The party also sought to cover its flanks, saying
it was in favour of the ``law taking its course''.
The position is in line with the Congress stand in the case of
the AIADMK's Ms. Jayalalitha and the former Bihar Chief Minister,
Mr. Laloo Prasad Yadav. In both cases, the party had said a mere
FIR was not enough to prove a person guilty, and that it would
wait for the court verdict before taking a final position. It
sought to differentiate between those involved in the Tehelka
expose and Mr. Vincent George. ``Here the guilt has to be proven,
while those people were seen accepting money and have also
confessed to having done so,'' said Mr. Reddy.
The Congress believes the Government has acted against Mr. George
purely to try and pressure its president, and therefore it must
resists the attempt. Even those critical of the functioning of
Mr. George, because of the timing of the FIR, believe action
against him at this stage would amount to the Government's
confession of guilt.
The Congress leaders in different ways continued to make the
point that it was the Government and not the Congress which was
adopting double standards.
The party also rejected the BJP demand that the Congress
president take moral responsibility for the case. It was pointed
out that unlike Mr. Brajesh Mishra, Principal Secretary to the
Prime Minister, Mr. George was a Congress employee working in the
party president's office, and was not paid a salary by the
Government unlike Mr. Mishra.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Next : 'Sonia owes an explanation' | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|