|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, March 26, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
'Pak. developing n-weapons faster than India'
By B. Muralidhar Reddy
ISLAMABAD, MARCH 25. Pakistan has edged past India in the nuclear
arms race, according to the London-based Jane's Intelligence
Review.
A Pakistani English daily, The News, in a special report today
quoted extensively from the prestigious military journal on the
relative strengths and weaknesses of the nuclear programme
embarked upon by both countries since the May 1998 nuclear tests.
The report quoted the journal as saying that the ``rhetoric'' of
Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam, Scientific Adviser to the Indian Prime
Minister, after the 1998 Pokhran tests that ``weaponisation is
now complete'' was not matched by reality.
``Since that time, however, internal politics, international
pressures and unique security concerns have caused Delhi and
Islamabad to undertake very different nuclear postures and
development plans,'' the journal said. According to the Jane's
Intelligence Review , India moved slowly towards developing and
implementing a nuclear strategy though it had grander
aspirations. On the contrary, Pakistan moved more quickly to
implement effective systems and procedures for its ``more modest
nuclear arsenal''.
It said the pace of development efforts could be seen in the
progress each country had made in competing delivery systems that
met their requirements. Procedures, tactics and doctrine for
nuclear use, as well as systems to ensure effective command and
control had been influenced by bureaucratic factors and each
government's view on the role of the nuclear weapons.
``In all these areas, Delhi has proceeded at a slower pace,
insisting on creating an original Indian system; Pakistan has
more fully implemented the lessons that it has learned from the
already established nuclear powers.''
The journal said India was constrained because the development of
its forces and strategy were controlled by the political
leadership and scientists from the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC)
and the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO).
``The political leadership in Delhi has not, however, fully
thought through the specifics of nuclear use or doctrine. It does
not view nuclear weapons as possessing military utility and
discounts the likelihood that they would be used on the
battlefield.''
In contrast, Pakistan's nuclear programme was controlled by the
Army and was fully incorporated into the country's military
strategy. ``Pakistan's officials believe that Islamabad's nuclear
capability gives it the option of strongly supporting insurgents
across the border in Kashmir.''
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Amnesty takes a dig at BJP policies Next : Rushdie's new novel | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|