|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, March 29, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Previous
| Next
Past is no guide
Sir, - Mr. K. G. Kannabiran's `Inquiry Commissions no substitute'
(March 26) is vehement in denouncing the appointment of a
judicial commission on the Tehelka tape disclosures and his
averment that these disclosures enable the filing of FIR and
start of a criminal procedure action forthwith seems far-fetched.
He also imputes motives on the part of the NDA Government, based
on the experience with similar judicial commissions in the past
when the Congress was in power.
But there is no true comparison between the Congress regimes of
the past and the present NDA Government. The latter has promptly
proved its bona fides by dropping the alleged Tehelka tainted
from party and official positions and suspending service
officers. There is certainly a strong public need to establish
what are the true evidential facts between the four hours' played
tapes and 96 hours of tapes still unrevealed, their legally
admissible factual evaluation and the victims' claim of
conspiracy and framing directed against them politically.
K. Muthulingam
Madurai
Sir, - The ferocity with which Ms. Sonia Gandhi exhibits her
sense of purity in public life in asking the Prime Minister, Mr.
Vajpayee, to quit office in the light of the Tehelka revelation
was conspicuously absent when her husband was embroiled and her
relatives were implicated in the Bofors scam. She could have
easily persuaded Rajiv Gandhi to step down. Where was her sense
of purity and righteousness gone when Mr. Narasimha Rao and his
son were involved in the MPs bribery and fertilizer cases?
Further, the contention of the Congress that the chargesheet
against Mr. Vincent George, Ms. Gandhi's private secretary,
smacks of political vendetta, is mere escapist gimmick since the
crux of disproportionate wealth is hardly controverted.
Mr. Laloo Prasad Yadav and Ms. Jayalalitha stand bereft of any
moral stance to talk about the BJP Government. Mr. George
Fernandes and Ms. Jaya Jaitley have resigned unlike the
`puritans' who did not give up their positions whenever they were
entrapped in scams and scandals.
R. Venkataraman,
Chennai
Sir, - The Tehelka ``exposures'' seem to be so authentic that not
only the Opposition parties like the Congress but even the close
associates of the BJP - the RSS and the Shiv Sena - could not
help but indict the NDA Government for its follies. The Defence
Minister, Mr. George Fernandes, resigned. Some Army personnel
were suspended. The Trinamool Congress withdrew its support to
the NDA Government and the BJP president, Mr. Bangaru Laxman, and
the Samata Party leader, Ms. Jaya Jaitley, had no alternative but
to quit.
Even the Prime Minister, Mr. A. B. Vajpayee, has blamed the
``system'' for the ``shortcomings'' exposed by the Tehelka tapes.
The hard-working Indian people for whom even a few thousand
rupees are big money feel disappointed over the corruption of
many crores of rupees involving people in high places.
V. M. Khaleelur Rahman,
Chennai
Sir, - There is nothing new about politicians playing a dubious
role. At one time, our honourable Prime Minister said no one in
his Government was involved in making money by unethical means.
Recently, he said our system should be revamped. Whatever the
findings of the Inquiry Commission, one thing is quite certain;
there is something unscrupulous under the carpet which should be
dirted out.
Kumar Amit,
Delhi
Sir, - If we go back to the Jain hawala scam, we will find that
the only two persons who were not prosecuted were those who
openly admitted to having accepted money from the Jains for party
funds. The reference is to Mr. Sharad Yadav and late Rajesh
Pilot. Interestingly, all those who denied having received money
were prosecuted. The media and all others accepted their stand.
In what way is Bangaru Laxman's and Jaya Jaitley's conduct
different?
Raghunath Singh,
Jaipur.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Previous : Bangladesh: transformation & turmoil - II Next : Nomination rejection | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|