|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, April 01, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Blair to put off elections?
By Hasan Suroor
LONDON, MARCH 31. If the newspaper which claims to have the ears
of Downing Street is to be believed, the general election is to
be put off by a month - from May 3, the Prime Minister, Mr. Tony
Blair's magic date for months - to June 7. The Sun, which only a
few days ago had confidently announced ``IT'S MAY 3,'' saidtoday
the poll was ``OFF.''
Its more cautious stablemate, The Times, also led with the same
story but, avoiding the brash self-assurance of The Sun, said Mr.
Blair was still consulting his Ministers and advisers, though he
was ``close to a decision'' to delay the election to devote more
time to direct the fight against the foot-and-mouth crisis.
There was no official word and a formal announcement was not
expected until Monday - the absolute deadline for taking a
decision either way because of constitutional requirements. The
Government was reported to be sharply divided with big guns like
the Chancellor, Mr. Gordon Brown, and the Deputy Prime Minister,
Mr. John Prescott, pressing that the Prime Minister stick to his
May 3 plan. The Culture Secretary, Mr. Chris Smith, said in a
radio interview that a delay would send out a wrong message
abroad and affect tourism. Mr. Prescott dismissed the Tories' and
farmers' demand for a delay saying a decision ``does not belong
to the Tories (and) it damn well doesn't belong to the farmers
either.''
An overwhelming majority of Labour MPs - barring those from rural
constituencies - favours a May 3 election and the chairman of the
party's parliamentary wing, Mr. Clive Soley, who did a headcount,
has conveyed the mood to Mr. Blair who himself has been insisting
in recent weeks that a delay would create a wrong impression
overseas that Britain was ``closed to business.'' This could do
enormous damage to the already crippled tourist industry.
But after visiting several areas affected by the foot- and-mouth
disease and listening to farmers, he is believed to have sensed
the public mood which is against an election inthe midst of a
national crisis.
In the past few days, he has been saying that his first priority
is to ``get on top'' of the crisis and election is far from his
mind. Observers say he does not want to give the impression of
being ``insensitive'' to public opinion and play into the hands
of the Tories who have been accusing him of``arrogance.'' The
rethinking is believed to have been influenced by several
factors, not the least by the latest opinion poll which shows
Labour still way ahead of the Tories inspite of widespread
dissatisfaction with the Government's handling of the foot-and-
mouth.
With such a formidable lead, Mr. Blair can afford to wait for
another month from a position of strength, it is stated. Far from
risking anything, he might even end up increasing his lead after
being seen to be responding to public sentiment. The appeal by
some bishops to delay the election might also contribute to a
final decision as Mr. Blair is believed to be sensitive to views
of religious leaders though some of his MPs have criticised the
bishops for ``meddling'' in politics. One thing is clear: the
election would be held in spring and the option of an autumn
election, favoured by some, is ruled out.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Hand Milosevic over to The Hague: U.S. Next : Putin popularity rises | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|