|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, April 01, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Sport
| Previous
| Next
King of the Kotla
THE most difficult definitional problem for the sociologist
concerns the middle class. We know who are the workers - those
who have no property and labour 14 hours a day. We know who are
the capitalists - they run firms listed on the Bombay Stock
Exchange had have bank accounts unlisted even in Switzerland. But
the middle class defies categorisation by property, or lack of
it. It is a class so heterogenous in status and income that it
must be broken up into many, and generally unsatisfactory,
categories: lower middle, upper middle, even (as George Orwell
once famously described himself), lower upper middle. Well,
before I came to study sociology, I knew from experience what the
middle class was about. To be part of it meant that sometimes one
looked above, sometimes below. With application, one could climb
to the upper storey, to be brought down within a day. If struck
by ill-luck, one was pushed down a level, but could crawl up
within 24 hours.
Such, at any rate, was my experience in seeking a ticket during
the Delhi Test of December 1974. Like kerosene and sugar and
motor cars, these were scarce in the command economy. One could
queue up all night, and still be told at the counter that were no
tickets left. It was best to spread one's bets widely, to tap
friends whose fathers were Joint Secretaries to the Government of
India and uncles who knew cricketers who might have a spare pass.
The days before the Test brought forth a desperate uncertainty:
would I enter legally on the morning of the match?
Alas, on the morning of this particular match I had no means of
entering the ground. Moreover, the Doordarshan of 1974 is not the
Spin Vision of 2001, and all I can recall of that day before the
college telly is some blurred balls and some waving bats. The
scorebook tells me that the home side batted first and were all
out for 220, with the debutant Parthasarathy Sharma scoring 54. A
total a hundred or more less than India would have liked, but
Solkar had struck back before the close, dismissing the stand-in
opener, Derryk Murray.
I had a ticket for the second day, a pass in the Ramprakash Mehra
pavilion no less. I reached an hour early, and saw Venkatraghavan
- the home captain - take some blinders at fielding practice.
When play started, it was Bedi from one end, the military medium
of Abid Ali from the other. Both Greenidge and the nightwatchman
- a little left-arm spinner from littler St. Kitts, and with the
quite wonderful names of Elequemedo Tonito Willett - were steady
but cautious. The first spark came when Abid dared bounce
Greenidge. The opener dismissed the ball from his presence with a
swing of the bat, the ball flying low over the fence, to hit a
tree that stood beyond square leg. The pace of the bowler was
modest, admittedly, but it remains the most imperious hook shot
of my experience.
Abid gave way to Prasanna, who soon had his man, Greenidge,
defying the coaching book by cutting at an off break. Engineer
leapt high with the catch and Kallicharan walked in, nattering to
himself. Then, right on the stroke of drinks, Willett also
departed, beaten on the outside edge by Prasanna. In came
Richards, on the heels of a twin failure in the first Test in
Bangalore. He started shakily, and next day's newspaper claimed -
as have dozens of articles since - that he was out caught behind
to Venkat at five, but given not out. From where I was, I of
course couldn't tell. Kallicharan, meanwhile, played a series of
sweetly timed cuts and glides. He reached 44 when he tried to
swing Bedi to leg and got a top edge. The ball swirled high into
the off side, the air also carrying to the spectators the
Sardar's command: "Brijesh". Venkat was at slip, Abid and Solkar
in the leg trap and, in those innocent days, no other Indian
could be relied upon to catch for keeps a non-stationary cricket
ball. Bedi knew this as well as anyone else, so he would get the
safest man in the outfield to elbow out the others.
Brijesh Patel took the catch, and the West Indies were 123 for 4.
The door was ajar, to be impatiently closed by the visiting
captain. In between overs, Lloyd talked to Richards, putting
heart into the novice. His shots then began to unfold, elegant in
their classicism. He was, it seemed, a Sugar Ray Robinson to his
captain's Joe Louis. Venkat brought on Abid, in hope, but
Richards stroked him twice to the off boundary. When Lloyd was
given out, to the most disgraceful of l.b.w. decisions, the
balance had already shifted. A lovely off drive for six off Bedi,
almost caressed, and a late cut took Richards to his 100. He was
now being supported first by Julien, who drove handsomely, and
then by Boyce, who swept away to leg. By the close, the West
Indies were 378 for 6, the match in their command.
I can recall, as I have said, little of the day of the 1974 Delhi
Test that I watched on TV, but the minutiae of this second day
are with me still. Five sixes, one apiece by Greenidge, Lloyd,
Richards, Boyce and Julien. Artful bowling by Prasanna and Bedi.
Dreadful fielding in the course of play but, before that,
Venkat's dream practice performance put on for two boys and a
passing crow. A sight I cannot forget came in view during the tea
interval. As I came down for a drink I passed Keith Boyce,
standing on the steps of the Willingdon Pavilion, smoking a
beedi. I looked him up and down, taking in the whites well
ironed, the shirt buttons open, the fast bowler's big boots and
the fast bowler's beautiful body. And the beedi, held askance, in
splendid and fateful arrogance. (Keith Boyce was to die in 1996
of a heart attack, having just turned 50. The beedi I saw was
probably one of thousands he smoked. Collectively deadly, but how
magnificent when viewed one by one!). The pavilion pass was for
one day only, but by the third morning I had gathered in a ticket
for the Rs. 30 stand, bought at a premium of 100 per cent. By the
time the deal was settled and the money raised, it was already
half-past nine. I reached the Kotla as play began, almost the
last man to enter a stand for which connoisseurs would queue up
from four in the morning. All I could find was a berth on the
ground, my nose pressed against the barbed wire.
After the first over I stood up to stretch myself: "Able salle
Guha," came a most welcome cry, "Idhar aa jaa." I looked up, and
saw my cricketing team-mate Piyush Pandey, calling me to sit with
him at row 15. I scrambled up, and settled into a crowd of rowdy
collegians. Pandey, who sat on one side of me, is now the most
highly regarded of Bombay admen. On the other side sat Chandan
Mitra, the editor as I write of The Pioneer.
It was not the best of views, looking out over wide mid off, but
at least I had a seat. As the sun bore down, Richards began to go
bananas. Bedi was hit for six, then Prasanna for two more. Venkat
put himself on, and Richards drove him straight, breaking the
stumps at the other end. Even the greatest of Indian fielders
would not stick his hand in front of that shot. Then one of my
neighbours issued a prediction. The next one, he said, will go
over the Wills Filter hoarding that rose high to the left of the
sightscreen. Richards came crashing down the wicket, and aimed
for long off. The ball climbed ever higher, cleared the Wills
sign comfortably, and finally came to rest in the Ambedkar
football stadium. It had travelled, in effect, from New Delhi to
Old Delhi. In this city of kingdoms, a new king had announced
himself.
RAMACHANDRA GUHA
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Sport Previous : Statistical highlights of third One-dayer Next : Brilliant rally helps Bagan survive | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|