|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, April 15, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Previous
Crafting an alliance
A lot of diplomatic work lies ahead before the idea of strategic
cooperation between India and the U.S. is translated into
reality, writes C. RAJA MOHAN.
IN HIS brief but intense one day visit to the United States last
week, the External Affairs Minister, Mr. Jaswant Singh, has set
the stage for the next act in the unfolding saga of Indo-U.S.
relations. He has won an agreement for a positive story line from
the new cast of characters on the American side.
The big new idea is about crafting an alliance between New Delhi
and Washington. However, the skeletal idea of strategic
cooperation between the two nations would require a great deal of
fleshing out. At the moment the proposed alliance is but an
agreed thought; a lot of diplomatic work lies ahead before the
idea is translated into reality.
Mr. Singh travelled to the U.S. with two basic objectives - one
was to find out if the Bush Administration was willing to sustain
the American enthusiasm for India generated in the final year of
the Clinton presidency. The other was to explore the prospects
for raising the relationship to a higher level.
On the first, there was a clear commitment from the U.S.
President, Mr. George W. Bush, that he wants to build on the
recent gains in Indo-U.S. relations. On the second, all the
signals from the new American leadership are positive. The most
important signal from Washington was that it might be ready to
work on one huge missing link in the expanding Indo-U.S.
relations - military cooperation. Is an alliance, then, between
India and the U.S. on the cards?
Two and a half years ago, following the nuclear tests of May
1998, the Prime Minister, Mr. Atal Behari Vajpayee, surprised his
audiences in the U.S. by declaring just that. When Mr. Vajpayee
went to the U.S. again, American scepticism about the idea of an
alliance with India, was yielding place to a mild interest.
Unlike the Clinton Administration which focussed on global
multilateralism to promote American interests, the Bush
Administration is oriented toward the realpolitik of alliances.
The indications during Mr. Jaswant Singh's visit are that the
Bush Administration might be willing to run with the idea of a
natural alliance between India and the U.S.
As Mr. Bush's National Security Adviser, Ms. Condoleezza Rice,
told Mr. Singh, India has now earned its place at the table of
global powers. This is a big shift from the Clinton
Administration's view that perceived India in the narrow of prism
of the Subcontinent.
The past policy focus in Washington was limited to issues arising
out of the tensions between India and Pakistan. The U.S. may now
be ready to engage India within the larger framework of a global
balance of power.
An alliance implies a set of political interests between two
powers. It is not difficult to define that set. Among the
converging interests between India and the U.S. are: the
maintenance of peace in the Indian Ocean, ensuring the free flow
of oil from the Persian Gulf at reasonable prices, the
safeguarding of sealanes in the region, prevention of the
proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and the preservation
of a stable balance of power in Asia.
Military cooperation to pursue common interests is the other
defining element of any alliance between two or more great
powers. But there is hardly any between India and the U.S.
Repeated attempts in the 1990s at building military interaction
after the Cold War spluttered. And after May 1998, the U.S.
imposed sanctions against defence ties with India, including on
high-level contacts between the two military establishments.
But in receiving Mr. Singh, who is also the Defence Minister,
with full protocol at the Pentagon, the U.S. Defence Secretary,
Mr. Donald Rumsfeld, was signalling that Washington will not let
the sanctions come in the way of a more intensive military
engagement with New Delhi.
India wants more than an interaction between the two services
that has been announced; it will be looking for more strategic
discussions between the two security establishments at the
civilian level as well as the renewal of transfer of defence
technologies from the U.S.
Meanwhile, the Indian Cabinet is likely to clear the long-delayed
General Security of Military Information Agreement (GSOMIA) with
the U.S. Will a prospective Indo-U.S. alliance be targeted
against China? The answer is no. Mr. Singh has clarified that
India wants its relationship with the U.S. to stand on its own
merit. Just as New Delhi has objected to being treated as a
Siamese twin of Pakistan all these years, it will not want its
American connection to be predicated on the ups and downs of
Sino-U.S. relations.
At any rate, despite the latest tensions, relations between
Washington and Beijing are deeper and wider than either Indo-U.S.
ties or the Sino-Indian equation. India is determined to improve
its relations with both the U.S. and China.
Even as it seeks to expand military cooperation with the U.S., it
will remain focussed on solving its many bilateral problems with
China.
Neither India nor the U.S. would want to build an exclusive
military alliance targeted against a third country. The new
military cooperation between New Delhi and Washington will be
part of a multiple engagement among all the major powers in Asia-
Pacific region. In East and South East Asia it will be integral
to promoting a credible balance of power within the region. In
the Persian Gulf, the military interaction would be about
building a coalition of regional actors and great powers to
promote energy security.
Those in India looking for an Indo-U.S. alliance targeted at
third countries such as China might be disappointed. Besides it
is important to remember that the military engagement between the
two countries is starting from a very low base. It will be a
while before the two military establishments develop
institutional familiarity and a strategic culture of effectively
working together to achieve common objectives.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Previous : India, the U.S. and China's long shadow | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|