|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, April 15, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Features
| Previous
| Next
The great wildlife debate
THE surge of enthusiasm in the realm of wildlife conservation, so
palpable in the 1970s and early 1980s, seems to have ebbed out.
After the implementation of Wildlife Protection Act of 1972,
strict conservation was enforced. Still, we seem to have only an
impressionistic estimate of the status of wildlife in India and
the recent uncovering of poaching rackets have further deepened
our concern.
This anxiety has generated a major debate around the whole
ideology of conservation, a debate that is often echoed in the
seminars on conservation and in nature writings. Some of the
strident voices of this school of thought are Ashish Kothari,
Mahesh Rangarajan and Vasant Saberwal. In this book, these three
proponents of the People for Conservation argument elaborate
their points of view, in eight chapters. They trace the origin of
much of the ills of conservation work to the policy of excluding
people from conservation strategies. They point out that unless
the local people are integrated into any project of conservation,
it will not succeed. The authors touch upon the important
milestones of wildlife conservation in India and point out how
people living in and around the forests have gradually lost out.
The pre-colonial rulers were not intrusive as far as forest
management was concerned. It was the British who saw forests as a
great source of revenue and decided to take strict control. The
deprived the local people of the benefit of their traditional
common resources. Later, strict protection of sanctuaries made
the local folks ecomigrants and, in time, impoverished. In many
protected areas, the people around have turned hostile to
governmental programmes of conservation and this is one reason
for the dwindling of wildlife in India.
Their argument is that to save what is left of our wildlife we
should adopt a different strategy than what obtains now and that
local people should not be excluded from the management of
sanctuaries; that their traditional rights and privileges should
not be denied. They argue that the interests of local communities
should be accommodated in the conservation strategies and
advocate a participatory policy. Otherwise they see no hope for
Indian wildlife. Moreover, since different parties rule in the
states, it is impracticable to expect the centre to effectively
implement conservation measures. Local initiative is the only
way, the say.
The counter to this argument comes mostly from forest officials,
in other words personnel who are actually implementing the
conservation programme in India. They see the situation as too
precarious to indulge in any experiment and advocate rigid
enforcement of the provisions of the Wildlife Protection Act. But
this side of the debate is not articulated much except through
few individuals like Shekhar Singh. He says that participatory
management could work if we have large tracts of forests. But
with only two per cent of area providing protected areas, which
are like little ecological islands, it may not be wise to relax
the controls. Some of the sanctuaries are small, sustaining a
tiny, single population of endangered animals - the Sangai deer
Kaibul Lamjo sanctuary or the lions of Gir for instances. He also
points out instances of forests controlled by locals, where
wildlife has been completely decimated, such as the Khasi hills
of Meghalaya. In the other protected areas also, even with all
the controls, the threats to wildlife and their habitats have not
decreased. Hopefully, the publishers of this book will consider
documenting the other side of this debate also.
The Tracts for the Times series, under which this book has been
published, a brain child of Dr. Romila Thapar and Dr. S. Gopal,
aims to bring out a series of monographs dealing with issues of
contemporary concern. The idea is to provide the lay reader
meaningful information, critical perspective and theoretical
reflections of the subjects chosen. The earlier titles included
Dalit Visions and Understanding Biodiversity. Like the other
titles in the series, this book also has been impressively
produced and is well edited. The meticulous documentation of this
book will be of immense help to students and researchers who want
to go deeper into this subject. So will be the table showing
"Expanded System of Conservation area categories".
S. THEODORE BASKARAN
People, Parks and Wildlife. Towards Coexistence, Vasant Saberwal,
Mahesh Rangarajan and Ashish Kothari, 2001, Tracts of the Times,
14, Orient Longman, paperback, Rs. 150.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Features Previous : Caught in turbulence Next : The folly of chivalry | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|