|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, April 17, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Previous
| Next
BALCO talks fail, Jogi blamed
By Our Special Correspondent
NEW DELHI, APRIL 16. The Centre today sought to distance itself
from the BALCO controversy by blaming the Chhatisgarh Chief
Minister, Mr. Ajit Jogi, for the continuing stalemate. ``I fail
to understand Mr. Jogi's behaviour. The stalemate is because of
the Chhatisgarh Chief Minister,'' the Union Mines Minister, Mr.
Sunderlal Patwa, told newsmen after the breakdown of tripartite
talks among the Centre, BALCO unions and the Chhatisgarh
Government.
Accusing the unions and the State Government of attempting to re-
open discussions on the sale of majority share in BALCO to a
private company, Mr. Patwa asserted that this issue could not be
discussed. ``Disinvestment has already taken place, the
Government has accepted the money, so there is no question of
discussing this issue,'' Mr. Patwa said.
``Mr. Jogi reversed his stand. He refused to join the second
round of talks along with new BALCO management despite his
earlier assurance. He rang me up today and said he cannot come as
his party had made a resolution... with this, my role to resolve
the issue comes to an end,'' said the former Madhya Pradesh Chief
Minister. ``My role was of an informal nature after Mr. Jogi
asked me to intervene. He changed his stand,'' said Mr. Patwa.
However, the unions remained defiant and said they would chalk
out the future course of agitation after consultation with the
workers in Korba, the location of the main BALCO plant. Mr.
Baleshwar Jha, heading a seven-union front, accused Mr. Patwa of
taking an unyielding stand. ``He did not budge an inch,'' he said
after the talks had failed yet again.
Responding to the union's charge, Mr. Patwa admitted that the
unions had submitted four options. But none of them could be
considered because all of them related to reversing the
disinvestment decision and reverting the company to the
Government fold. ``We have crossed that bridge. I am powerless to
take a decision of this nature,'' he noted, adding that he was
committed to the welfare of the workers but the disinvestment
decision could not be reopened under any circumstances. ``There
is no question,'' he asserted repeatedly.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Previous : Ensure fair polls: EC Next : Jayalalitha files nomination in Krishnagiri | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|