|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, April 17, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
CJ favours greater recourse to alternative dispute resolution
By Our Special Correspondent
HYDERABAD, APRIL 16. The Chief Justice of the A. P. High Court,
Mr. Satya Brata Sinha, said here today that courts in the country
would not have been facing the present docket explosion if there
was greater recourse to alternative dispute resolution methods.
In the United States, he said, only 10 per cent of cases came up
for trial in Court with the remaining being resolved through
arbitration and conciliation. It would be desirable if at least
25 per cent of the cases were disposed of in India in this
manner.
The Chief Justice was inaugurating a workshop on the `Role of
arbitration in the wake of the Code of Procedure (Amendment) Act,
1999' organised jointly by the Federation of AP Chambers of
Commerce and Industry (FAPCCI) and the Indian Council of
Arbitration (ICAR).
Tracing the history of arbitration in India and in the West,
Justice Mr. Sinha said courts were empowered to refer disputes
for arbitration when the British set up mofussil courts in India
in the 18th century but these procedures were abandoned with the
passage of time. Several other Acts were passed in the last
century to promote the use of arbitration which did not, however,
meet their objectives.
The FAPCCI president, Mr. Mohanlal Gupta, said the CPC Amendment
Act of 1999 made it obligatory for the Courts to refer the
dispute after framing of issues for settlement either through
arbitration, conciliation or mediation. It was only if the
parties failed to get their dispute settled through the alternate
dispute resolution (ADR) route that the suits could proceed.
Mr. Siva Subba Rao, Member, Bar Council of AP, strongly disagreed
with the commonly held view that civil litigation was rising and
that the judiciary was not able to cope with the demand,
especially at the mofussil level. It was the disposal rate that
had come down. He said irregular exercise of powers by the
Government was the main reason for increase in litigation and for
making higher judiciary a "Government error-correction centre".
The Chairman of the Bar Council of A.P., Mr. M. Rajender Reddy,
the Executive Director of ICA, Mr. G.K. Kwatra, and Mr. C.V.
Nagarjuna Reddy, advocate spoke.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : Voice mail! Next : Line of no control! | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|