|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, April 17, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Next
Factions and posturings
THE WEEK-OLD CRISIS in the Congress(I) on the poll front in
Kerala, triggered by its veteran leader, Mr. K. Karunakaran, much
to the consternation of its partners in the UDF, has been
resolved, with the party high command going rather out of the way
to mollify him by agreeing to accommodate his `loyalists' in
three more constituencies and, in the process, bringing about
parity between his group and that of his traditional rival, Mr.
A. K. Antony, in numerical terms. Out of the 88 seats the party
is contesting, these two major camps have got 37 seats each, the
rest being shared by the other two distinctly identifiable
groups. If factional feud is endemic to the Congress(I) in the
State, angry outbursts and open, often intimidatory, defiance of
the party leadership by a `wronged' or `slighted' Mr. Karunakaran
have acquired an element of weary predictability particularly
after his ouster from the Chief Ministership in 1995, just a year
ahead of the 1996 Assembly elections. And almost invariably, the
party high command has been accommodative, even when the demands
were known to be driven purely by his personal and factional
interests. It is not very different this time either.
Although an impression was sought to be created that his `revolt'
had to do with his daughter, Ms. Padmaja Venugopal, not being
nominated for an Assembly seat, Mr. Karunakaran was in fact
playing for much higher political stakes, with an eye on the
post-election scenario. As one who had never reconciled himself
to his unceremonious exit from the post of Chief Minister in
1995, only to make way for his bete noire, Mr. Antony, he has
evidently been wanting to wipe out and avenge that ignominy.
Every move of his in the Assembly poll context fits into the
overall strategy of positioning himself at a vantage point vis-a-
vis other factions in the party so that the `key' to the choice
of Chief Minister would be with him; this of course is premised
on the UDF emerging with a majority in the new Assembly, which
itself is considered a distinct possibility, given the Kerala
electorate's tendency to alternate its preference between the two
coalitions. Having first got the high command to agree to not
project anyone as the Chief Ministerial nominee and to leave the
choice to the party legislators themselves, Mr. Karunakaran
obviously wanted to maximise the chances of his `men'
constituting the largest contingent within the party's MLAs. And
he could not have asked for more than what has now been offered.
There is of course the larger issue of his perceived grievance of
not being consulted or taken into confidence by the party
leadership on national concerns still to be sorted out.
By its intervention, the Congress(I) high command may have
neutralised the Mr. Karunakaran-specific potential damage. It is
however a moot question whether, in the wake of such correction,
the overall electoral prospects of the party as also of the UDF
remain undiminished. Although Mr. Antony has, in his own
characteristic way, agreed to abide by the party's decision -
even if it is a ``painful'' one - there is every possibility of
the rebel factor from the rival factions making its presence felt
in the constituencies affected by the reopening of candidates'
list. Given the sort of animus and rancour that has come to
define the attitude of the two major factions towards each other,
it may not come as a surprise at all if they worked at cross
purposes at the hustings, each camp seeking to sabotage the
chances of the party's nominee belonging to the rival group. To
say, as the Congress(I) men often do, that factions only
strengthen, not weaken, the party is not even convincing
political rhetoric. But the point is that there is the real risk
of their starting to believe it to be so and this may well prove
harmful for the UDF, given Kerala's highly polarised political
context and the BJP's desperate attempt to carve out some
credible electoral space for itself as a third force.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Next : The menace of poaching | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|