|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, April 19, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Previous
| Next
Crime and punishment
Sir, - Your Editorial and the letters ``Nuanced judgment'' and
``But intriguing'' of the same date: the following points arise
for consideration. You have observed in your lucid Editorial that
unless there are further developments on the legal front, Ms.
Jayalalitha's eligibility to contest is likely to be settled by
the three-member Election Commission on the study of the Madras
High Court judgment. While dismissing the petition of Ms.
Jayalalitha, the judge has made obiter dictum not enforceable by
law.
Conviction follows an intentional wrong doing (mens rea) proved
by evidence of moral certainty. Conviction is followed by a
sentence which is a sanction behind the offence. Conviction and
sentence are separate entities. The first is a genus and the
second is its specie. The following important factors emerge for
consideration: If the conviction is stayed, does it not
tantamount to allowing the appeal itself which is pending?
Disqualification under Section 8 of the Representation of the
People Act shall be deemed to commence from the date of
conviction. It is already on the run. Hence the ball is in the
court of the Election Commission under electoral law and not
otherwise. The State chooses certain offences for punishment and
certain others for indemnification. In the instant case, both the
elements of conviction and confiscation (Section 169 IPC) are
present. Will not the stay of conviction tantamount to freedom of
transfer of Tansi Land which may multiply time-consuming
litigations? Is this the intention in the stay of conviction?
Therefore, there can be no stay of conviction in public interest
but only of sentence either contemporaneously or at a later point
of judgment of a trial court. One concerns aspects of criminology
and the other of penology.
Will the Election Commission enlighten the Returning Officers and
the public on the issue of disqualification law?
M. Palanisami,
Chennai
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Previous : Jayalalitha and the poll Next : The ethical question | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|