|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, April 19, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Previous
Undermining the office of Speaker
By Harish Khare
NEW DELHI, APRIL 18. It is unfortunate enough that the Congress
should continue to persist with a strategy that is calculated to
demean and eventually delegitimise the very institution of
Parliament, it is no less unfortunate that the ruling benches are
doing their best to undermine the authority and prestige of the
office of Speaker of the Lok Sabha.
It was nothing short of a scandal that the BJP Parliamentary
Party spokesman, Mr. Vijay Kumar Malhotra, should have sought to
arrogate to himself the functions of the Speaker. In his daily
interaction with the media at Parliament House, Mr. Malhotra
today unhesitatingly talked of only two options before the House
if the stalemate was to be resolved: first, that the financial
business be passed (presumably in the midst of predictable
pandemonium) and then the House could be adjourned sine die; and,
second, that the agitating Congress members be suspended, thereby
restoring some order in the House.
That Mr. Malhotra deemed it necessary to voice his party's
``feelings'' in the matter is presumptuous, to say the least. The
Government's job is to bring legislative proposals before the
House, it is the responsibility of the Speaker to ensure order
and debate in the House. Mr. Malhotra cannot encroach upon the
Speaker's domain.
And the Speaker is not a partisan of the ruling party. He is the
custodian of the autonomy, prestige and procedural integrity of
the House. This task becomes all the more crucial at a time when
no political party enjoys a majority and the ruling coalition
itself is dependent upon uncertain support from its presumed
allies. Transaction of legislative business, in this age of
coalitions, becomes a matter of daily negotiation and bargain,
never a simple matter of majority and minority.
It is for the Speaker to facilitate negotiation and bargaining
among the various groups, especially between the ruling party and
the principal Opposition party. Only a Speaker who is deemed to
be acting independently, fairly and firmly can help the
Government to get the cooperation of the Opposition.
Unfortunately the ruling party's parliamentary managers have been
far from mindful of the deference and respect that is due to the
office of the Speaker.
In the face of continued presumptuousness on the part of the
ruling party, Mr. G.M.C.Balayogi has shown remarkable patience.
But this is not a matter just between Mr. Balayogi and Mr. Pramod
Mahajan, or between the BJP and the TDP. It is a matter of
institutional prestige and respect for the office of the Speaker.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Previous : The ethical question | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|