|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, April 19, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Science & Tech
| Previous
| Next
All but bare essentials
THE EYE as a camera has been a powerful metaphor for poets and
scientists alike, implying that the eye provides the brain with
detailed snapshots that form the basis for our rich experience of
the world.
Recent studies at the University of California, Berkeley,
however, show that the metaphor is more poetic than real. What
the eye sends to the brain are mere outlines of the visual world,
sketchy impressions that make our vivid visual experience all the
more amazing. "Even though we think we see the world so fully,
what we are receiving is really just hints, edges in space and
time," said Frank S. Werblin, professor of molecular and cell
biology in the College of Letters & Science at UC Berkeley.
Werblin is part of UC Berkeley's Health Sciences Initiative, a
collaboration among researchers throughout the campus to tackle
some of today's major health problems. The brain interprets this
sparse information, probably merging it with images from memory,
to create the world we know, he said.
In a paper in Nature, doctoral student Botond Roska and Werblin
provide evidence for between 10 and 12 output channels from the
eye to the brain, each carrying a different, stripped-down
representation of the visual world. While scientists have known
that the eye forwards several parallel representations of the
world to the brain, what these are and how they are produced has
been a mystery. "What we have done," Roska said, "is show that
the retina creates a stack of image representations, how these
image representations are formed and that they are the result of
cross-talk between layers of cells in the retina."
The results are a big step toward producing a bionic eye
employing a unique computer chip that can be programmed to do
visual processing just like the retina. The chip, called a
Cellular Neural Network (CNN) Universal Machine, was invented in
1992 by Roska's father. Over a period of nearly three years,
Roska painstakingly measured signals from more than 200 ganglion
cells in the rabbit retina as he flashed pictures of a
featureless square or circle. Ganglion cells are the eye's output
cells, forming the optic nerve connecting it to the brain.
One group of ganglion cells, for example, only sends signals when
it detects a moving edge. Another group fires only after a
stimulus stops. Another sees large uniform areas, yet another
only the area surrounding a figure.
The two researchers shared these detailed findings with software
designer David Balya in Hungary, who modelled the visual
processing on a computer, a preliminary step before actually
programming a CNN chip to simulate the image processing that goes
on in the eye. The computer model precisely mimics the output of
the ganglion cells of the retina, vividly showing the difference
between the world we see and the information that actually is
sent to the brain.
Though scientists realize that the eye is not merely a camera
providing digital input to the brain, the general consensus has
been that the world projected onto the retina and detected by
cells called photoreceptors got sent to the brain after some
relatively simple processing.
Roska and Werblin showed that retinal cells do a lot of
processing to extract only the essence of the picture to send to
the brain. The anatomy of the retina is layered to facilitate
this. Light initially impinges on the light-sensitive cells of
the eye, the photoreceptors, which fire off signals to a layer of
horizontal cells and thence to bipolar cells.
The bipolar cells funnel signals down their axons - the outgoing
wires of the nerve cell - and relay them to the dendrites or
input wires of ganglion cells, which send the processed
information to the brain. All these cell types are arrayed in
unique layers, stacked one atop the other. Biologists noted
earlier that all ganglion cells were not alike and that they
fired off different information to the brain, though the details
were hazy. Part of the reason is that the axons from the bipolar
cells synapse with or touch the dendrites of the ganglion cells
in a tangled region (the inner plexiform layer) that made
biologists despair of making sense of the connections. Roska
discovered, however, that this region of tangled axons and
dendrites is really laid out in orderly strata. By staining the
cells from which he recorded, he found that bipolar cell axons
converge on 12 or so well-defined layers, where they synapse with
the dendrites of the ganglion cells. Each layer of dendrites
belongs to a specific population of ganglion cells.
Without interaction between layers, though, the signal emerging
from the tangle would not be much different from the original 12-
channel output of the bipolar cells. The critical element is
another type of cell, the amacrine cells, which send processes to
the various layers of dendrites and allow the layers to talk with
one another. This cross-talk is what allows the layers to process
the visual data and extract the sparse information that the
ganglion cells send up to the brain.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Science & Tech Previous : Human cell lines available free for research Next : Noni plant gives new drugs | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|