|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, May 05, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Congress may withhold funds to U.N.
By Sridhar Krishnaswami
WASHINGTON, MAY 4. There is anger in the administration and
Congress over the United States losing its seat at the Human
Rights Commission; and the first impression is that law makers
will react to the vote by denying funds already agreed upon to
the world body. As if the snub to Washington was by itself not
enough, countries like Pakistan and Sudan have been chosen for
membership.
The stinging loss of the seat, the first time since 1947, has
signalled to the Bush administration the feelings of not just the
developing world, but by the developed nations of Europe. And
Conservatives here are seething with rage making the assessment
that it was not only countries like Cuba and China that worked
overtime behind the seats to ensure the United States was thrown
out, but also some European countries.
Senator Jesse Helms, a long time critic of the functioning of the
United Nations system, said the loss of the seat did not come as
a surprise for a ``few European countries manoeuvred - in a
secret vote - to eliminate the United States from the United
Nations Human Rights Commission''. Mr. Helms was one of the
senior law makers who had crafted an agreement for the payment of
U.S. dues to the U.N.
According to a report in The New York Times, the Bush
administration has been caught by surprise, for over 40 nations
had apparently made it known that they would support the U.S.
What has caused outrage in Congressional circles is that
countries which the U.S. consistently criticises for poor human
rights record are now in the Commission.
Says Mr. Tom Lantos, a California Democrat who chairs the Human
Rights Caucus, ``It is absurd that rogue states and chronic human
rights abusers such as Libya, Sudan and Cuba remain on the
Commission and sit in judgement on the human rights practices of
others while the United States now stands on the sidelines''.
Conservative law makers have predicted that the voting out of the
U.S. will have an impact on the its payment plan to the world
body. The House of Representatives, for instance, is to take up
the State Department Authorisation Bill next week. What is being
pointed out is that while Washington expected China and Cuba to
campaign against the it, there had always been an understanding
with Europe that the U.S. will have one of the three allotted
seats on the Commission.
That so-called accord with Europe has now come to mean little.
The belief that Europe may have had a hand in the secret vote
against the U.S. will be added to the long list of differences
the Bush administration has been having with its cross-Atlantic
allies. The Europeans were dismayed that the Republican
administration was walking out of the Kyoto Accords; appalled
that Washington would want to carry on a high profile anti-China
Human Rights Resolution in Geneva which eventually flopped; and
are apprehensive of the National Missile Defence system. The U.S.
stand on such issues as the International Criminal Court of
Justice has not helped as well.
For the record, the State Department, in expressing
disappointment, has said that the vote will not change the basic
thrusts of American human rights policy. ``Our commitment and
resolve to address human rights problem around the world is a
matter of U.S. policy; it will not be affected by this vote'', it
said in a statement. Aside from Europe, there has been general
resentment in the developing world over the attitude of the U.S.
on a number of issues including human rights. Several nations
have come to despise the sermonising of Washington on the subject
of human rights and freedoms, including religious freedom; and
have not taken kindly to the U.S. annual ``report cards''.
The throwing out of the U.S. and the election of Sudan to the
Commission, ironically, came on the day the President, Mr. George
W. Bush, delivered a speech strongly backing human rights,
religious freedoms and a scathing attack on Sudan. ``My
administration will continue to speak and act for as long as
persecution and atrocities in Sudan last'', Mr. Bush said in a
speech. Mr. Bush made no reference to the U.S. losing its seat.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : PoK polls on July 5 Next : Russia threatens to revise deal with U.S. on space station | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|