|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, May 08, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Features
| Previous
| Next
Teaching is a mission...
EACH AND every discussion on teachers invariably begins with a
charged elaboration of the exalted position accorded to them by
the Indian tradition for ages. Teachers were considered an
embodiment of values, character, scholarship, leadership and as
persons who practised what they preached. The place of the
`acharya' and `guru' is often considered higher than that of
parents. There is a basic strength in this approach. All great
thinkers, philosophers, creative persons, rulers and people who
have changed the direction of human development attribute their
achievements to their teachers, irrespective of the system and
the tradition of education, which may differ from place to place
and country to country. Such discussions often end with the
lament that the teachers of today are no more the teachers of the
past.
The period 1857-1947 could be considered as having great
significance in the history of the Indian nation. These were the
years when every Indian, irrespective of caste, creed, region or
any other conceivable diversity, came forward to identify with a
common national goal. Such a goal could be identified only by
nations with an entrenched inner strength of their own and with
deep roots in their respective cultures and traditions. Each and
every Indian decided to free India from the foreign yoke. I have
often wondered about the possible means of communication,
dissemination of information and messages during the long journey
to freedom in the 19th Century and in the first half of the 20th
Century. We still have the privilege of having among us veterans
who have participated in the freedom struggle and acquired first
hand experience of the manner in which things happened. It is
indeed amazing to learn that they were teachers who played a
silent but most critical part in spreading the message of the
leaders of the freedom struggle to the masses. When the entire
set-up of the governance was against them, they dared to spread
Gandhian thoughts and ideas and decided to wear khadi. This was a
unique response created by the teachers in an otherwise
frightening situation. They, however, had the inner strength and
courage of conviction and worked with a missionary zeal.
The onslaught of an alien education system on the established
system of Indian education, teaching and learning resulted in a
gradual isolation from the process of education, which was
traditionally managed by the community and society. The
consequences of the government taking over the system are being
felt even at this stage by the education system of the country.
Communities are convinced that it is the sole responsibility of
the government to educate their children and provide the
necessary infrastructural support to the process. Further, those
managing the system treat teaching as a job and no more as a
mission. The causes for such a situation could be analysed in
detail. It may, however, be worthwhile to deliberate upon some of
the major criticism that is often heaped on the teachers at this
stage.
The focus of teacher criticism among parents is on their non-
availability in schools, lack of confidence and inadequate
commitment to the profession. Parents are also critical of the
increasing tendency on the part of teachers to encourage children
to take private tuitions. There has been a gradual and visible
loss in public perception of teachers' credibility due to this.
This applies to teachers at each stage of education, including
institutions of higher education which enjoy a national and
international reputation. There are well-known practices such as
appointment of proxy teachers by regular teachers in the places
of their posting and making necessary `adjustments' with the
higher functionaries of departments of education to ensure that
this innovative system does not result in failure at any stage.
The nation must examine the professional aspects of schooling, as
well as those concerning teachers and their education regularly.
There are umpteen factors responsible for lack of professionalism
in teachers. The process of recruitment and promotion often lacks
transparency and rarely generates faith among young aspirants.
Professionalism cannot be nurtured in those who `somehow' sneak
into a profession. Only those who prepare hard and enter the job
market through the transparent process of selection and
recruitment will develop internal faith and confidence to prove
worthy of the task assigned to them. Recruitment of teachers must
be a process of total assessment of the individual in all
aspects, including competence, commitment and willingness to
work. Mere paper qualifications are not sufficient. Sometimes
even these are not authentic. Change of qualifications with
change of governments leaves much to be desired in terms of
credibility as well as confidence.
It must be noted that whether one likes it or not, teachers
create future societies. The fibre of young individuals who shall
become the citizens of tomorrow directly depends on the level of
preparedness of their teachers, particularly at the school stage
of education. Logically, quality teachers can be produced only by
teacher education institutions which follow the highest
professional standards and work at an optimum level of
efficiency. This aspect has remained neglected. In fact, the
production of poor quality teachers by institutions with poor
infrastructure and facilities, as well as inadequate staff needs
serious analysis. Thousands of teachers have been trained using
strategies that were professionally unsound, academically
inadequate and devoid of value. Teachers and teacher educators of
the country are familiar with the correspondence courses leading
to B.Ed., degrees and the havoc they have created in respect of
quality of teacher education.
In the days of serious conflict between maternalistic pursuits
and spiritual quests, the shape of things to come in the future
hardly appears encouraging. With liberalisation, privatisation
and globalisation (LPG) these tensions are sure to become more
explicit.
In the mad race to accumulate wealth, young persons see salvation
in IT and ICT and achieve the objective by rushing abroad to get
handsome jobs with multi-nationals. There is apparently nothing
undesirable in such an approach but certain related issues need
to be considered. What happens to the rest of the youth who
hardly find avenues for utilisation of their competencies and
capabilities which they may have acquired under difficult and
adverse conditions? The basic question is, do we really provide
them a chance to discover their own potential? If not, are we not
unfair to the future of the country and also unconcerned with its
present? Even those who are lucky to acquire high qualifications
in Information Technology and succeed in getting a job abroad
must be acquainted with the sublime features of Indian tradition
in which the objective of life is to serve others, particularly
the downtrodden and the deprived. While earning wealth is one of
the natural requirements of living a decent life, it is certainly
necessary to curb the single minded pursuit of wealth, at the
cost of being sensitive to others. The common man, unfamiliar
with the policy making process puts his entire faith in the
schools and in the teachers. Inadequacies in the curriculum,
pedagogy and the transaction process are considered the
responsibility of the school alone. It is now well established
that communities in India have the experience of highly
`educated' young persons without having acquired any skills, or
competencies for entrepreneurship - and self-employment. When
they do not get jobs in the organised sector, they feel ignored,
neglected and even cheated. Can the nation afford to waste its
human resource in such a manner? The system of school education
rarely gives experience of industry, agriculture and other
economic activities to the majority of learners. In fact,
alienation of community from the school has lowered the
credibility of the process of learning and acquisition of skills.
Community expertise is not utilised in imparting vocational
skills to the learners. It has also been observed that teachers
`reluctant to change are poorly led and managed, and are hardly
trained'. Training is no longer a one-time activity. It has to be
brought into the professional life of a teacher and at regular
intervals by the system through recurrent orientation programmes
and inservice education opportunities.
Inservice education programmes initiated in the 1960s aimed at
untrained serving teachers and also for preparing teachers to
teach such components of the curriculum which they may not have
studied during their own schooling and training.
Correspondence courses for untrained serving teachers were
launched by the National Council of Educational Research and
Training in 1964. Subsequently, there has been a greater emphasis
on inservice education of teachers, and different strategies and
models have been attempted. A number of teachers were trained
through the Progamme of Mass Orientation of School Teachers
(PMOST), 1986 and the Special Orientation Programme for Teachers
(SOPT), 1992. The NCERT has been contributing by assisting
professionally in the preparation of key persons and resource
persons in practically every area included in the curriculum of
school education. At the present juncture, the major issue before
the nation is to utilise the new information technology and reach
every teacher in the country. Such a possibility has emerged for
the first time and initial experimentation has already been
conducted with considerable success.
The level of seriousness with which teacher preparation needs to
be viewed by a nation, still striving to achieve universalisation
of education, is still missing. The establishment of the National
Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) has been a well received
decision. The NCTE has contributed to the regulation of
considerable number of poor quality education programmes at pre-
service stage. Its recommendation to have a two-year B.Ed.
programme deserves to be considered very seriously by the policy
makers.
J. S. RAJPUT
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Features Previous : Ayurvedic massage techniques Next : Know Your English | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|