|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, May 08, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Features
| Previous
| Next
Points for parents to ponder
THE air is thick with anxiety and expectation. In every other
home, the talk is about entrance examinations, tutorial colleges,
admission to the preferred course, and of course, the great big
``what if?'' What if I do not get through the engineering or
medical college entrance exam? What if I don't get more than 90
per cent in the 10th board exam? What if all my friends get in
and I don't?
In a world that seems to present us with a bewildering array of
choices in terms of consumables, places to go, clothes to wear,
and television programmes to watch, the one sphere where there
seems to be more restriction than choice is education. Or it may
be more correct to say that we behave as if we have no choice.
The closing off of options begins quite early in a child's life.
No matter what the parents do for a living, most children want to
become doctors or engineers. Very few will say with pride that
they want to be nurses, or historians, or teachers. Those are
options that exist only in the absence of the Big Two.
Obviously, not all the thousands of children who apply to a
medical or engineering course will get admission to the course,
much less to the college of their choice. Those who ``fail'',
often become depressed and lose all sense of self-esteem and,
more important, end up feeling that they have no choice left.
Some resort to desperate measures while others half-heartedly
look for other things to do, convinced that they have missed the
bus to a sure-fire career.
We all know that there are lots of interesting things for people
to do, and lots of important functions to perform, that have
nothing to do with either engineering or medicine. Then why is it
that these other pathways are not even peeped into by the vast
majority of school leaving children or their parents? Why is it
that they are considered ``last ditch options'' or as second-
level alternatives? Why do we rob all our children of their last
few years of childhood and force them into rigorous ``boot
camps'' that prepare them for possible careers in medicine or
engineering even if they exhibit no interest in or talent for it?
Apart from commerce, which is one strong alternative to the two
professional streams, there are not many students who consciously
and purposively choose to enter regular degree programmes in
science or arts. Fewer still enter such programmes with an
appreciation for the many career options they can lead to.
Even in cases where the children have some notion that they would
like to pursue something ``different'', most parents feel that
there is less prestige (and therefore desirability) in these
alternatives. For instance, a girl who recently completed her
tenth class exam was exploring the idea of preparing for a career
in some area of biological research, but her father, time and
again, said, ``But with biology, the first option is medicine -
the rest is only if you don't get into medicine!'' The sorts of
issues that were playing on the child's mind were perceived
prestige of the occupation, what relatives would say and think,
and financial security. While the last is a real and serious
concern, the first two are mirages that need to be addressed
firmly.
Children get their notions of what is acceptable and desirable
largely from their parents and their peers. While there is not
much one can do about peer influence, parents can do their bit to
give their children a healthier and more realistic perspective on
their future options. We need to break free from this mindset
that the world has nothing to offer our children if they do not
get into medicine or engineering, or that they are intellectually
inferior if they choose to go into less prominent fields. We need
to make them see that these are only two among a variety of
options, and give them the confidence that success does not
depend on what you do but how well you do it. We need to create
the space for them to see and hear things that are new and
exciting, in the hope that they will carve creative and
fulfilling futures for themselves, in a multitude of different
ways. So for every ``what if?'' they know that several answers
exist, that several answers are not only possible but highly
desirable. That should be the direction career counselling takes.
USHA RAMAN
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Features Previous : Know Your English Next : Someone has to care | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|